
A U.S. District Court hearing on Wednesday saw Judge Kenneth Bell preside over oral arguments regarding NASCAR’s motion to dismiss the antitrust lawsuit filed by 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports. The case, which has drawn significant attention from the racing community, centers around the alleged monopolistic practices of NASCAR and the ongoing tension between the organization and race teams over charter agreements.
According to a report from Matt Weaver of SPORTSNAUT, Judge Bell expressed a desire to personally assess the arguments from both sides. Beyond the procedural requirement to hold oral arguments, Bell stated he wanted an opportunity to “size up” the parties involved and allow them to do the same.
The lawsuit stems from allegations by race teams that NASCAR has engaged in anti-competitive practices through its control of charter agreements and revenue distribution. NASCAR, however, has pushed back on these claims. Chris Yates, the organization’s outside counsel, argued that the race teams, through the Race Team Alliance (RTA), have acted as a cartel by banding together to influence the terms of the agreements. According to Yates, this collective approach from the teams is the true source of any anti-competitive behavior.
Read more: Racing Rivals Accuse NASCAR of Retaliation in High-Stakes Antitrust Battle
Judge Bell reportedly questioned this stance by pointing to NASCAR’s own negotiation tactics. He asked whether NASCAR’s final offer to teams in August, described as a “take it or leave it” proposal, mirrored the very behavior NASCAR was criticizing. Yates responded by asserting that NASCAR’s actions were different, explaining that after two years of discussions, the organization had reached a point where it needed to prepare for the 2025 season.
Per the statement from NASCAR’s counsel, the organization offered to share 47 percent of TV revenue with the teams, but Yates claimed the teams continued to act collectively in a manner that justified the “cartel” characterization. The teams’ attorney, Jeanifer Parsigian, rejected these assertions, indicating her disagreement with Yates’ portrayal of the situation.
Source: Sports Business Journal
Featured News
Charter to Acquire Cox Communications in $35 Billion Deal
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Targets Media Watchdog Over Alleged Collusion Against Musk’s X
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Drops Antitrust Case Accusing Pepsi of Squeezing Small Retailers
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
Shein Warns of Higher Costs for French Shoppers Amid EU Fee Proposal
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
DOJ Opens Antitrust Probe of Google’s AI Partnership with Character.AI
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
CPI
Industrial Strategy and the Role of Competition – Taking a Business Lens
May 21, 2025 by
Marcus Bokkerink
Industrial Policy, Antitrust, and Economic Growth: Some Observations
May 21, 2025 by
David S. Evans
Bolder by Design: Crafting Pro-Competitive Industrial Policies For Complex Challenges
May 21, 2025 by
Antonio Capobianco & Beatriz Marques
Competition-Friendly Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
Philippe Aghion, Mathias Dewatripont & Patrick Legros