Novo Nordisk Caps Insulin Prices in Settlement with Minnesota Attorney General

Novo Nordisk, a leading Danish pharmaceutical company, has agreed to cap insulin prices as part of a settlement with Minnesota’s attorney general, who accused the three largest insulin manufacturers of inflating the drug’s cost to astronomical levels. The settlement, filed Monday in a Newark, New Jersey federal court, follows similar agreements reached last year with Eli Lilly and French drugmaker Sanofi, according to Reuters.
Under the terms of the settlement, Novo Nordisk will limit out-of-pocket expenses for patients who pay cash to $35 per monthly prescription, regardless of insurance status. Additionally, the company will provide free insulin to low-income Minnesotans with annual household incomes at or below 400% of the federal poverty level—approximately $128,600 for a family of four. The settlement, which lasts five years, is still pending court approval. Per Reuters, Novo Nordisk denied any wrongdoing in reaching the agreement.
Read more: Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, who filed lawsuits against Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, and Sanofi, accused the companies of prioritizing profits over patients by setting artificially high list prices and using rebates to negotiate lower prices with pharmacy benefit managers. Insulin, a life-saving drug used by patients with type 1 diabetes and some with type 2 diabetes, has seen its costs skyrocket in recent years. According to Ellison, these settlements mark a significant step toward affordable access to insulin, with reductions in patient costs exceeding 90%.
Eli Lilly and Sanofi reached their respective settlements with Minnesota in February and July 2024. At a press conference, Ellison emphasized the human impact of these legal victories, stating, “For years, manufacturers prioritized making billions in profits over saving lives.”
Novo Nordisk expressed satisfaction with the agreement. A company spokesperson noted that the settlement underscores its dedication to ensuring affordable insulin access. The company, which has U.S. offices in Plainsboro, New Jersey, joins Eli Lilly and Sanofi in facing scrutiny for price-setting practices that allegedly burdened patients relying on insulin to manage their condition.
The lawsuits targeted the manufacturers’ practice of using the wholesale acquisition cost—or list price—as the basis for determining out-of-pocket costs, which plaintiffs argued led to inflated expenses for consumers.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
FTC Withdraws Case Against Microsoft-Activision Merger, Citing Public Interest
May 23, 2025 by
CPI
Charter to Acquire Cox Communications in $35 Billion Deal
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Targets Media Watchdog Over Alleged Collusion Against Musk’s X
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Drops Antitrust Case Accusing Pepsi of Squeezing Small Retailers
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
Shein Warns of Higher Costs for French Shoppers Amid EU Fee Proposal
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
CPI
Industrial Strategy and the Role of Competition – Taking a Business Lens
May 21, 2025 by
Marcus Bokkerink
Industrial Policy, Antitrust, and Economic Growth: Some Observations
May 21, 2025 by
David S. Evans
Bolder by Design: Crafting Pro-Competitive Industrial Policies For Complex Challenges
May 21, 2025 by
Antonio Capobianco & Beatriz Marques
Competition-Friendly Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
Philippe Aghion, Mathias Dewatripont & Patrick Legros