
Cengage and McGraw-Hill, the No. 2 and 3 largest US college textbook companies, terminated their merger agreement on Monday under pressure from US and British antitrust enforcers.
Cengage said the deal, announced in May 2019, was scrapped “by mutual agreement due to a prolonged regulatory review process and the inability to agree to a divestitures package with the US Department of Justice.” McGraw-Hill simply said closing conditions could not be satisfied.
The deal, which would have created a company worth about $5 billion, came at a time when college textbook prices were stable or declining slightly after two decades of rising sharply, according to US government data. McGraw-Hill is owned by Apollo Global Management.
Cengage and McGraw-Hill are behind Pearson, the world’s biggest education company, in market share.
A source familiar with the transaction said the Justice Department had demanded “significant divestitures of several dozen courses” to address antitrust concerns.
Britain’s antitrust enforcers, the Competition & Markets Authority, said in a statement that the companies had offered divestitures that were “unlikely to be sufficient in addressing its competition concerns.”
“The COVID-19 crisis has accelerated the need for students to learn wherever they are,” Cengage CEO Michael Hansen said. “On a standalone basis, Cengage is very well-positioned to continue to support the transition to digital.”
Full Content: St Louis Post-Dispatch
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Australia’s Major Supermarkets Face Scrutiny Over Profit Margins Amid Rising Prices
Mar 21, 2025 by
CPI
Fired FTC Commissioners Warn of Potential White House Influence Over Mergers
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Dr. Matthew Backus Joins Compass Lexecon as an Affiliate
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
UK to Boost Broadband Competition While Capping Openreach Charges, Says Ofcom
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Singapore Competition Watchdog Yet to Receive Formal Notification on Grab-GoTo Merger
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li