
Turkey’s competition board announced on Thursday that it has concluded its investigation into Meta Platforms, Inc. regarding potential competition law violations related to data-sharing practices between its social media platforms, Threads and Instagram. According to AOL, the board’s decision follows Meta’s commitments to address concerns raised during the inquiry.
The investigation, which began last year, scrutinized Meta’s linking of user data between Threads and Instagram, a move that some argued could unfairly bolster its market position. In April, Meta temporarily suspended its Threads platform in Turkey in response to an interim order from the competition authority, AOL reported.
Per a statement from the board, the commitments presented by Meta were deemed sufficient to resolve competition issues. Among these measures, Meta pledged that both existing and new Threads users would be able to create and use Threads profiles independently of Instagram accounts. This adjustment will take effect once Threads is reintroduced in Turkey.
Related: Turkey Closes Antitrust Probe into Meta’s Threads-Instagram Practices
Additionally, Meta assured the competition authority that data collected through Threads would remain separate from Instagram unless users explicitly opted to merge their accounts. This separation aims to alleviate concerns over data consolidation potentially stifling competition in the digital space.
The Turkish competition board’s decision to end the investigation marks a significant development in the oversight of major tech platforms’ practices within the country. The resolution also clears the way for Threads to resume operations in Turkey, albeit under more rigorous compliance standards.
Source: AOL
Featured News
CFPB Allows Some Operations to Resume Amid Legal Challenge
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
NASCAR Accuses Michael Jordan’s Race Team of Illegal Cartel in Legal Battle
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare Providers Sue BCBS Insurers Over Alleged Collusion
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Indian Distributors File Antitrust Case Against Quick-Delivery Giants
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
EU Lawmakers Send Letter Rejecting Claims of Bias in Digital Rules
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li