UK Antitrust Regulator Signals Flexibility in Merger Reviews to Boost Economic Growth

The United Kingdom’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) announced plans to prioritize its efforts on addressing “truly problematic mergers” while adopting a more flexible approach to approving deals, a move aimed at aligning with the government’s focus on economic growth. The statement from the antitrust watchdog came during the Chatham House Competition Policy 2024 Conference on Thursday, where CMA Chief Executive Sarah Cardell outlined the regulator’s evolving strategy.
Rethinking Remedies for Mergers
In her address, Cardell emphasized the need to support business activity by ensuring that every viable merger capable of being approved—either unconditionally or with remedies—receives the green light. According to Reuters, she stated that only mergers posing irreparable harm to competition would be blocked outright. The CMA is now exploring the use of behavioral remedies, such as commitments to investments or customer protections, to address potential anti-competitive issues—marking a shift from its traditional reliance on structural remedies like divestments.
This shift follows the CMA’s handling of the high-profile $69 billion Microsoft-Activision Blizzard deal in 2023. The regulator initially blocked the acquisition before reversing its decision after concessions were offered by the companies. Per Reuters, this sparked criticism of the CMA’s decision-making process and prompted an internal review of its merger assessment procedures.
Read more: UK Court Hears Motorola’s Appeal Against CMA’s Price Cap on Emergency Service Network
Balancing Growth and Regulation
The CMA’s recalibration aligns with recent calls from Prime Minister Keir Starmer for regulatory bodies to adopt a more growth-oriented mindset. Starmer specifically highlighted the CMA last month when he pledged to reform regulations that he argued were stifling economic progress. Speaking to investors, he stressed the importance of regulators taking growth as seriously as the business community does.
Cardell responded by reaffirming the CMA’s commitment to promoting competition while ensuring that the UK remains attractive to businesses. “We must deliver a regime that leaves no one in any doubt that the UK is open to business,” she said, according to Reuters.
Early Signs of Change
Industry observers have already noted signs of the CMA’s evolving approach. Mark Kelly, CEO of M&A-focused MKP Advisors, pointed to the recent Vodafone-Three merger as evidence of the regulator’s growing flexibility. The CMA has indicated that the deal could be pro-competitive if commitments on investment and consumer protections are upheld. Kelly noted that this represents a notable departure from the CMA’s historical stance, per Reuters.
Post-Brexit Role Expansion
Since Brexit, the CMA has taken on a larger role in scrutinizing mergers, previously under the purview of the European Commission. This has amplified the regulator’s influence but also heightened scrutiny of its decisions. Cardell acknowledged the challenges, noting that while the CMA has made progress in overhauling its processes, more can be done to ensure timely and effective outcomes.
Source: Reuters

Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook, has faced a significant setback in Nigeria as the country’s Competition and Consumer Protection Tribunal upheld a hefty fine imposed on the tech giant. The $220 million penalty was originally levied by Nigeria’s Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) last year for violating local consumer protection, data privacy, and protection laws. The fine comes after an appeal by Meta was dismissed by the tribunal on Friday.
According to Reuters, the FCCPC had accused Meta of discriminatory and exploitative practices that disproportionately impacted Nigerian consumers. The commission argued that Meta’s operations in Nigeria did not adhere to local regulations as rigorously as those in other jurisdictions with similar consumer protection and privacy frameworks. This perceived inequity led to the imposition of the fine last July.
Read more: Meta Lawyers Try to Undercut Instagram Co-Founder’s Damaging Testimony
The decision by the tribunal marks a significant moment in Nigeria’s regulatory efforts to hold multinational corporations accountable for their actions in the country. It also highlights the increasing scrutiny that global tech companies face in various markets regarding their adherence to local laws, particularly concerning consumer rights and data protection.
Per Reuters, Nigeria’s Competition and Consumer Protection Commission has been actively strengthening its enforcement of consumer protection laws, aiming to curb practices that undermine local regulations. The commission’s actions against Meta serve as part of its broader effort to ensure that companies comply with local norms and standards, particularly in the digital economy.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Meta’s $220 Million Fine in Nigeria Upheld by Competition Tribunal
Apr 27, 2025 by
CPI
DoorDash Proposes $3.6 Billion Acquisition of Deliveroo
Apr 27, 2025 by
CPI
US Judge Delays Approval of $2.8 Billion NCAA Settlement Over Athlete Rights
Apr 27, 2025 by
CPI
US Launches Criminal Antitrust Probe Into TP-Link’s Pricing Practices
Apr 27, 2025 by
CPI
CK Hutchison’s $22.8 Billion Port Sale to BlackRock Draws Chinese Scrutiny
Apr 27, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece