UK pharmaceutical conglomerate AstraZeneca secured a landmark ruling last Friday when a jury in federal court found the firm did not harm competition through a pay-for-delay scheme with India-based generics firm Ranbaxy.
According to reports, while the jury found that AstraZeneca had made unjustified payments to Ranbaxy to delay the release of a generic form of a competitive drug, the jury said those payments were not unreasonably anticompetitive because no competing company had the regulatory clearance to sell that generic drug.
The case was the first pay-for-delay suit since the US Supreme Court sided with the Federal Trade Commission in ruling that such agreements could be deemed anticompetitive.
Dozens of drugstore chains, wholesalers and potentially hundreds of thousands of class members had sued AstraZeneca for violating antitrust law when it paid Ranbaxy to delay the release of the generic, cheaper form of Nexium. AstraZeneca reportedly faced up to $10 billion in fines.
Full content: Bloomberg
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Redfin Settles $9.2M Commission Inflation Lawsuits
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Supports Colorado’s Efforts to Block Kroger-Albertsons Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Japan Considers Regulation of AI Developers
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
European Commission Extends Decision Deadline for Ita-Lufthansa Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
UK, US and Australia Sanction Senior Leader of LockBit Cybercrime Gang
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI