A diverse group of associations, including the American Cable Association (ACA), as well as media consolidation opponents and conservative news outlets, are getting together to formally oppose the merger of Sinclair and Tribune, which would result in the nation’s largest broadcast TV group.
The group includes a big critic of conservative media and a conservative media outlet, united in their strong opposition to the deal.
Joining ACA president Matt Polka on a conference call to announce their Federal Communications Commission (FCC) filings in opposition to the deal were former FCC chairman and Common Cause special adviser Michael Copps, One America News Network president Charles Herring, Computer & Communications Industry Association president Ed Black and Competitive Carriers Association Senior Vice President Tim Donovan.
Their issues include the group’s potential power in retrans negotiations and in setting a local news agenda, as well as Sinclair’s role in the rollout of the ATSC 3.0 next-gen broadcast transmission standard, which also has potential retrans negotiations implications. The group said there are effectively no conditions that would make the deal palatable.
Full Content: Variety
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.

Ministers from Keir Starmer’s Labour government in the U.K. met with members of Parliament this week to offer concessions on the proposed Data (Use and Access) Bill in a bid to speed passage or the measure. The government offered to commit to conducting an economic impact assessment of the bill’s proposed reforms, as well as a separate report on the reforms’ technical feasibility. According to The Times, however, peers and members were not impressed with the offer, with Liberal Democrat digital spokesperson, Lord Timothy Clement-Jones calling it “a bit of a pig in a poke.”
Among other things, the bill would amend U.K. copyright law to allow the use of copyrighted works without the permission of the rightsholder to train AI models, while providing an option for rights owners to affirmatively “opt-out” of allowing their works to be used. The government considers the bill critical to maintaining Britain’s technological competitiveness with the European Union, which included a similar text-and-data mining (TDM) exemption and opt-out provision in the AI Act.
But the copyright provisions in the U.K. bill have drawn sharp criticism from members of the U.K. creative industries, including from such luminaries as Sir Paul McCartney, and their objections have attracted champions in both houses of Parliament. Peers in the House of Lords last month added amendments to the bill intended to better protect the creative industries, including enhanced data transparency requirements on AI companies, but the government stripped out those measures when the bill was sent to the House of Commons.
The concessions offered by the government this week were intended to short-circuit parliamentary “ping-pong,” that could delay final passage.
Read more: UK Watchdog Scrutinizes Ticketmaster’s Dynamic Pricing Amid Oasis Ticket Controversy
Adding fuel to the increasingly heated debate, the Tony Blain Institute for Global Change headed by the former prime minister this week published a report arguing that enforcement of overly strict copyright laws risks straining trans-Atlantic relations and could drive AI companies out of Great Britain. “The current US administration has indicated that it will not pursue strict AI regulations – and views attempts by other countries to do so as anti-competitive,” the report says.
The Data Bill is part of a broad initiative by the Starmer government to bolster the U.K.’s technological strengths amid the global race for preeminence in the field of artificial intelligence. Several countries outside of Europe, including Japan, Korea and Singapore, have also recently adopted TDM exceptions to bolster domestic AI development, some of which, such as Singapore’s do not include a provision to allow rightsholders to opt-out.
Even where such a provision is included, as in the EU AI Act, critics have questioned the technical feasibility of enforcing an opt-out request. Former Stability AI executive Ed Newton-Rex, who led development of the company’s music-generator AI, Stable Music, has emerged as a vocal critic of the TDM-with-opt-out regime. He left Stability in 2023 over disagreement with the company’s position on the use of copyrighted works in AI training and has since launched London-based Fairly Trained, which certifies AI models trained on licensed or public domain data.
In interviews and op-eds, Newton-Rex has argued no technical means currently exist that can reliably prevent AI systems from crawling and scraping data from public sources, rendering opt-out provisions moot.
Source: The Times
Featured News
U.K. Government Offers Concessions on Data Bill, But Can’t Quell Opposition
Apr 6, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Suit Claims Rental Companies Conspired to Inflate Construction Equipment Prices
Apr 6, 2025 by
CPI
TikTok’s US Spin-Off Deal Stalled as China Responds to Trump’s Tariffs
Apr 6, 2025 by
CPI
NFL Names New Top Lawyer as Antitrust Challenges Mount
Apr 6, 2025 by
CPI
Copyright Lawsuits Against OpenAI and Microsoft Consolidated in New York
Apr 6, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – China Edition: Year of the Snake
Apr 3, 2025 by
CPI
The Fair Competition Review and the Unified National Market in China
Apr 3, 2025 by
Sen La & Wei Han
Facing the Conundrums: China’s Antitrust Policy Amid Geopolitical Shifts
Apr 3, 2025 by
Da Shi
Concentrations in China in 2023 and 2024
Apr 3, 2025 by
John Yong Ren, Karen Mei & Martha Shu Wen
SAMR’s Evolving Role on the Geopolitical Chessboard
Apr 3, 2025 by
Andrew Foster, Danette Chan & Flora Xiao