
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has called on the Supreme Court to reject a request by President-elect Donald Trump to delay the implementation of a law that would either force the sale of TikTok’s U.S. operations or ban the app outright. According to Reuters, the DOJ filed its request late Friday, arguing that Trump’s legal team has not demonstrated that TikTok’s Chinese parent company, ByteDance, is likely to succeed on the merits of its case.
The law in question, passed in April 2024, mandates that ByteDance divest TikTok’s U.S. assets by January 19, 2025, or face a nationwide ban on the popular social media platform. Trump’s legal brief, filed last week, asked the court to postpone that deadline, citing a need for more time to seek a political resolution to the matter after he takes office on January 20. The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments in the case on January 10.
Per Reuters, the DOJ stressed in its filing that concerns over TikTok’s data practices are a matter of national security, stating that no one disputes China’s interest in collecting sensitive information on American citizens. The filing asserts that TikTok’s extensive collection of user data poses a “grave threat” due to the potential for espionage and covert influence.
“No one can seriously dispute that [China’s] control of TikTok through ByteDance represents a grave threat to national security,” the government argued, emphasizing that TikTok’s access to data on approximately 170 million Americans could be exploited.
Related: TikTok Enlists Veteran Supreme Court Advocate to Fight Potential US Ban
TikTok, however, contends that the law unfairly targets the app on the basis of its social media content rather than its data practices. In a filing submitted Friday, TikTok urged the Supreme Court to block the law, arguing that it violates the First Amendment’s protection of free speech. According to Reuters, the company pointed to Congress’s decision not to ban other Chinese-owned apps, such as Shein or Temu, as evidence that TikTok was singled out for its platform content.
If the Supreme Court does not intervene before the January 19 deadline, the law would ban new downloads of TikTok from major app stores, including Apple’s App Store and Google Play. Although existing users would still be able to access the app temporarily, the DOJ said services would gradually degrade and eventually cease as companies would be prohibited from providing updates and support.
In his filing, Trump’s attorney, D. John Sauer, argued that delaying the implementation of the law would allow the new administration to explore diplomatic solutions. “The president-elect respectfully requests that the Court consider staying the Act’s deadline for divestment of January 19, 2025, while it considers the merits of this case,” Sauer wrote.
The broader legal battle over TikTok has been ongoing for years amid growing concerns in Washington about the app’s Chinese ownership and its potential impact on U.S. security. Critics of the platform argue that its data collection practices could be leveraged by Beijing for surveillance purposes, a claim that TikTok has repeatedly denied.
Source: Reuters

The University of Kentucky is advancing plans to restructure its athletics department under a newly formed corporate entity, Champions Blue LLC. The proposed change is intended to give the university greater flexibility in navigating the escalating costs tied to a potential settlement of multiple athlete-compensation lawsuits.
According to a statement from university officials, the creation of Champions Blue LLC reflects a strategic adaptation to the mounting legal and financial challenges facing collegiate athletic programs. These challenges stem from three consolidated antitrust cases targeting the NCAA and the Power Five conferences over restrictions on athlete compensation. The litigation could result in substantial financial obligations for universities if a settlement is reached.
Kentucky athletics director Mitch Barnhart and executive vice president for finance and administration Eric Monday said Champions Blue LLC is designed within the framework of how the university currently structures its healthcare services. Per a statement from the university, this approach offers a tested model that could help streamline operations and increase financial agility.
While it remains unclear whether Kentucky’s move will be a first among major collegiate athletic programs, university officials emphasized that the new structure aligns with existing internal models for other large-scale operations. The implementation of Champions Blue LLC remains contingent on approval from the university’s board of trustees. The board’s athletics committee convened on April 24, with the full board scheduled to vote on the measure on April 25.
The timing of this development is particularly notable given Kentucky’s significant athletic budget. The university reported nearly $202 million in operating revenue and close to $197 million in expenses for the 2023–24 fiscal year, per its annual financial submission to the NCAA. These figures place the Wildcats among the top 15 public universities in both categories, according to data compiled by USA TODAY Sports and the Knight-Newhouse College Athletics Database at Syracuse University.
Source: USA Today
Featured News
University of Kentucky Eyes Structural Shift Amid Antitrust Pressures
Apr 24, 2025 by
CPI
Opt-Out Flops Out At WIPO Meeting on AI and IP
Apr 24, 2025 by
CPI
Belgian Watchdog Fines Pharma Giants Over Anti-Competitive Practices in Pharmacies
Apr 24, 2025 by
CPI
X Sues Minnesota Over Law Banning AI Deepfakes in Elections
Apr 24, 2025 by
CPI
Twelve States Sue Trump Over Tariff Policy, Citing Overreach of Executive Power
Apr 24, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece