Nexium found that AstraZeneca had violated the antitrust laws by acting to keep generics off the market but that no generic would have been introduced earlier in the market even without the violation. Thus, the jury found that the plaintiffs were not entitled to relief. Though the defendants have yet to file a response, they will likely argue the plaintiffs cannot show a threatened injury.
Featured News
California Pushing Back Against Federal Preemption of Its Privacy Laws
May 7, 2026 by
CPI
Rave Sues Apple in Antitrust Case Over App Store Removal
May 7, 2026 by
CPI
Trivago Files Antitrust Case Against Google in Germany Over Search Practices
May 7, 2026 by
CPI
A New Idea Is Gaining Ground: Tax AI Computing Power to Offset Job Losses
May 7, 2026 by
CPI
Morocco Competition Authority Opens Antitrust Probe Into Luxury Beauty Market
May 7, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Unilateral Effects
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
A Net Present Value Approach to Merger Analysis
Apr 28, 2026 by
Joseph J Simons & Malcolm Coate
Generative AI and Competitive Disruption: Increasingly Relevant for Merger Analysis?
Apr 28, 2026 by
Andrea Coscelli, Emily Chissell, Nitika Bagaria & Tega Akati-Udi
Non-Price Unilateral Effects In Media Mergers
Apr 28, 2026 by
Lapo Filistrucchi & Teresa Oriani
Ecosystem Mergers and Unilateral Effects? A Framework for Assessing the Ecosystem Theory of Harm
Apr 28, 2026 by
Ethel Fonseca, George Tucker & Helder Vasconcelos