Corinne Chew, R. Ian McEwin, Nov 05, 2010
The Baidu case, one of the first abuse of dominance cases in China, is important in several respects. First, it was one of the first private competition law actions in China. Second, the judgment was read out in a real-time broadcast. Third, the legal reasoning was more detailed than in other competition law cases. Fourth, the Court stressed the importance of economic reasoning and evidence in deciding such cases. This paper analyzes both the facts of the case and its significance.
Featured News
Nigeria Antitrust Regulator Probes Uber’s Abrupt Exit
Sep 6, 2026 by
CPI
Verisign, ICANN Face Antitrust Lawsuit Over .Com Domain Pricing
Sep 6, 2026 by
CPI
US Justice Department Expands Beef-Pricing Probe to Grocery Chains
Sep 6, 2026 by
CPI
EU Lawmakers Press Brussels to Keep Breakup Option Open in Google Ad-Tech Case
Sep 6, 2026 by
CPI
AI Copyright Fight Expands as Regional Newspapers Target OpenAI, Microsoft
Sep 6, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – State Attorneys General
Aug 27, 2026 by
CPI
CPI Talks… with Jonathan Skrmetti, Attorney General of Tennessee
Aug 27, 2026 by
Jonathan Skrmetti
What the Live Nation Jury Instructions Tell Us About California’s Unfair Competition Law
Aug 27, 2026 by
Henry Hauser, Brent Nakamura, Ashley Kaplan, Brian Wang & Cari Jeffries
From Backroom Deals to Public Scrutiny: The Tunney Act’s Past, Present, and Future
Aug 27, 2026 by
Christina M. Black & Ashley A. Locke
Understanding the Fragility of Economic Concentration Through the Principles of Ecology
Aug 27, 2026 by
Alexandra Spring