Antitrust authorities have pursued cartels with steadily increasing vigor over the last three decades. Guided in significant part by economics and game theory, authorities have both ratcheted up fines to discourage forming cartels and implemented leniency programs to encourage cartel members to rat on their partners in crime. Yet, despite massive fines and hefty civil damages in some jurisdictions such as the United States, business people still conspire against the public to raise prices. Even tossing the occasional price-fixer in jail has not dissuaded executives from entering into agreements with their rivals over prices. Of course, even an efficient criminal justice system does not eliminate all wrongdoing. Nevertheless, there is a widespread perception that antitrust is not doing enough to discourage price-fixing.
Featured News
Supreme Court Lets CREXi Antitrust Case Against CoStar Move Forward
Mar 23, 2026 by
CPI
Oregon Just Passed the Country’s Toughest Chatbot Law. Your Company May Already Be Breaking It.
Mar 23, 2026 by
CPI
Newsmax, DirecTV Join Challenge to FCC’s Nexstar-Tegna Decision
Mar 23, 2026 by
CPI
House Committee Readies Hearing on Tokenized Securities Trading Rules
Mar 23, 2026 by
CPI
Vinson & Elkins Launches Brussels Office With Hire of Hogan Lovells Antitrust Partner
Mar 23, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Data-Driven Competition
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Data-Driven Competition: Implications For Enforcement and Merger Control
Mar 19, 2026 by
Alexandre de Corniere & Greg Taylor
From Tipping to Trustees: Why Data-Driven Markets Require Institutional Design, Not Optimization
Mar 19, 2026 by
Jens Prüfer & Paul de Bijl
Data Barriers to Entry: What We’ve Learned About Spotting Them and What We Still Don’t Know About Solutions
Mar 19, 2026 by
Bruno Carballa-Smichowski
When the Perfect Is the Enemy of the Good: Price Discrimination, Affordability, Precarity and Market Dynamism
Mar 19, 2026 by
Dan Ciuriak