Antitrust authorities have pursued cartels with steadily increasing vigor over the last three decades. Guided in significant part by economics and game theory, authorities have both ratcheted up fines to discourage forming cartels and implemented leniency programs to encourage cartel members to rat on their partners in crime. Yet, despite massive fines and hefty civil damages in some jurisdictions such as the United States, business people still conspire against the public to raise prices. Even tossing the occasional price-fixer in jail has not dissuaded executives from entering into agreements with their rivals over prices. Of course, even an efficient criminal justice system does not eliminate all wrongdoing. Nevertheless, there is a widespread perception that antitrust is not doing enough to discourage price-fixing.
Featured News
Acima Reaches Deal With 43 States Over Consumer Leasing Practices
Nov 12, 2026 by
CPI
Michigan Takes Aim at Mackinac Island Ferry Monopoly in Antitrust Fight
Nov 12, 2026 by
CPI
Farmers Union Blames Corporate Consolidation for Rising Grocery Costs
Nov 12, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea Weighs Bank-Controlled Stablecoin Rules as Fintech Firms Push Back
Nov 12, 2026 by
CPI
EU Closes Antitrust Probe Into Dutch Rail Operator NS
Nov 12, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Data Portability
Nov 12, 2026 by
CPI
Mandating Access to a Dominant Platform’s Inferred Data: A Two Scenario Diagnosis
Nov 12, 2026 by
Sean Ennis
Data Portability Between Individual Control and Data Sharing at Scale
Nov 12, 2026 by
Jasper van den Boom & Inge Graef
Information Also Wants to Be Expensive: Data Portability and the Open-Systems Creed
Nov 12, 2026 by
Justin (Gus) Hurwitz
Data Portability’s Cybersecurity Paradox: When Protecting Consumer Data Restricts Competition
Nov 12, 2026 by
Sasha Hondagneu-Messner