Jean-Charles Rochet, Jean Tirole, Jan 30, 2015
Many if not most markets with network externalities are two-sided. To succeed, platforms in industries such as software, portals and media, payment systems and the Internet, must “get both sides of the market on board.” Accordingly, platforms devote much attention to their business model, that is, to how they court each side while making money overall. This paper builds a model of platform competition with two-sided markets. It unveils the determinants of price allocation and end-user surplus for different governance structures (profit-maximizing platforms and not-for-profit joint undertakings), and compares the outcomes with those under an integrated monopolist and a Ramsey planner. (JEL: L5, L82, L86, L96)
Featured News
Amazon Gains Access to OpenAI Models, Challenging Microsoft’s Cloud Lead
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
Google Signs Pentagon Deal to Provide AI for Sensitive Government Use
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
Bipartisan Pair of Lawmakers Introduce Omnibus AI Bill
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
Global Watchdogs Struggle to Track Risks From Advanced AI in Finance
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
EU Clears Airbus–Air France-KLM Joint Venture as Parliament Backs New Trade Scheme
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Unilateral Effects
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
A Net Present Value Approach to Merger Analysis
Apr 28, 2026 by
Joseph J Simons & Malcolm Coate
Generative AI and Competitive Disruption: Increasingly Relevant for Merger Analysis?
Apr 28, 2026 by
Andrea Coscelli, Emily Chissell, Nitika Bagaria & Tega Akati-Udi
Non-Price Unilateral Effects In Media Mergers
Apr 28, 2026 by
Lapo Filistrucchi & Teresa Oriani
Ecosystem Mergers and Unilateral Effects? A Framework for Assessing the Ecosystem Theory of Harm
Apr 28, 2026 by
Ethel Fonseca, George Tucker & Helder Vasconcelos