A PYMNTS Company

EU: UN could take control of ICANN

By  |  August 29, 2016

When the Obama administration announced its plan to give up US protection of the internet, it promised the United Nations would never take control. But because of the administration’s naiveté or arrogance, UN. control is the likely result if the US gives up internet stewardship as planned at midnight on Sept. 30.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    On Friday Americans for Limited Government received a response to its Freedom of Information Act request for “all records relating to legal and policy analysis… concerning antitrust issues for the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers” if the US gives up oversight. The administration replied it had “conducted a thorough search for responsive records within its possession and control and found no records responsive to your request.”

    We’d love to be your preferred source for news.

    Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!

    Add as Preferred Source

    It’s shocking the administration admits it has no plan for how Icann retains its antitrust exemption. The reason Icann can operate the entire World Wide Web root zone is that it has the status of a legal monopolist, stemming from its contract with the Commerce Department that makes Icann an “instrumentality” of government.

    Antitrust rules don’t apply to governments or organizations operating under government control. In a 1999 case, the Second US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the monopoly on internet domains because the Commerce Department had set “explicit terms” of the contract relating to the “government’s policies regarding the proper administration” of the domain system.

    Full Content: The Wall Street Journal

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.