A PYMNTS Company

US: Nexium Plaintiffs Seek a Permanent Injunction

By  |  January 21, 2015

Nexium found that AstraZeneca had violated the antitrust laws by acting to keep generics off the market but that no generic would have been introduced earlier in the market even without the violation. Thus, the jury found that the plaintiffs were not entitled to relief. Though the defendants have yet to file a response, they will likely argue the plaintiffs cannot show a threatened injury.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Specifically, by finding that AstraZeneca would not have introduced its own generic had another generic entered the market, the jury found no threatened injury. The defendants may therefore argue that plaintiffs have failed with respect to their burden of proof. The hearing date for the permanent injunction is scheduled for February 6, 2015 before Judge William G. Young in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

    We’d love to be your preferred source for news.

    Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!

    Add as Preferred Source

    Full Content: Press Release

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.