According to a press release from the Hellenic Competition Commission, Greece will hear a case regarding allegations that Proctor & Gamble abused its dominant position in the baby diapers and care products market in the nation. The regulator announced it would head the arguments in the early part of this September as a result of issuing a statement of objections to the company, which accuses P&G of colluding to exclude competitors from the baby products market – those collusions, according to the HCC, included mixed bundling rebates and “rebates conditional upon the commitment of excessive shelf space for its products,” in addition to other practices in violation of Greece’s competition laws. Read the full press release below.
Athens, 20 July 2013
PRESS RELEASE
Investigation into alleged infringements of Articles 1 and 2 of Law 703/77, as well as Articles 101 and 102 TFEU, by Procter & Gamble (P&G) in the retail market for baby diapers in Greece
Following the issuing of a statement of objections, the Hellenic Competition Commission will convene in the beginning of September and hear a case of alleged infringements of Articles 1 and 2 of Law 703/77 and of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU (in particular, abuse of a dominant position) in connection with commercial practices employed by P&G with regard to baby diapers and related baby care products in Greece.
According to the statement of objections, P&G has adopted and implemented during the investigated period 2003 – 2011 abusive practices aimed at maintaining and/or strengthening its dominant position in the market for baby diapers, thereby excluding competitors and limiting their growth possibilities. The alleged abusive conduct included, inter alia, individualized target rebates, mixed bundling rebates, rebates conditional upon the commitment of excessive shelf space for its products, as well as the imposition of unfair trading conditions.
The issuing of a statement of objections does not prejudge the existence of an infringement. The Hellenic Competition Commission will decide upon the case, taking into account all relevant facts and after hearing all implicated parties.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Uruguayan Antitrust Scrutiny Puts Major Meatpacking Deal Between Marfrig and Minerva on Hold
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Alaska Airlines Seeks Dismissal of Consumer Lawsuit Over $1.9 Billion Hawaiian Airlines Buy
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Idaho Attorney General Orders Split of Kootenai Health and Syringa Hospital
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Court Rejects T-Mobile’s Appeal Bid in Antitrust Case Over Sprint Merger
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Google Requests Judge, Not Jury, to Decide on Antitrust Case
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI