The US Supreme Court has reportedly denied an appeal by power management company Eaton Corp Plc of a lower court’s jury verdict against the company, accused by a rival of hampering competition by making exclusive agreements with truck transmission manufacturers. Eaton was accused by Z.F. Meritor of colluding with the manufacturers in the sale of heavy-truck transmissions in deals that allowed the manufacturers to earn money rebates if enough of Eaton’s products were purchased. Additionally, the rival accused Eaton of requiring that those manufacturers more favorably price the transmissions than those of Meritor’s. In a statement, Eaton acknowledged the rarity for the Supreme Court to hear appeals, though highlighted the company’s disappointment in the decision.
Featured News
Carey Bolsters Competition Law Team With New Senior Counsel
Mar 15, 2026 by
CPI
TikTok US Sale Could Deliver $10 Billion Windfall to the United States
Mar 15, 2026 by
CPI
States Press Ahead With Live Nation Antitrust Trial After Federal Settlement
Mar 15, 2026 by
CPI
US Pulls Back Draft Regulation Targeting Global AI Chip Shipments
Mar 15, 2026 by
CPI
Selecta and Bondholders Ask US Court to Dismiss Antitrust Lawsuit Over Creditor Pact
Mar 15, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece