A professor at the University of Tennessee College of Law is promoting an intriguing concept: antitrust should, in theory, promote happiness. Professor Maurice Stucke has written an article, “Should Competition Policy Promote Happiness?”, in which Stucke argues antitrust regulators, like other economic policymakers, should focus on improving individuals’ quality of life through their work. While the author recognizes that the literature on happiness does not provide a direct guide for antitrust policy, he does suggest that antitrust “can and should” lead the way to a more fulfilling life for individuals, offering “more than the mindless pursuit of accumulating cheap products.”
Featured News
Italian Antitrust Authorities Open Probe Into Telecom Network-Sharing Deal
May 11, 2026 by
CPI
Coalition of Attorneys General Calls for Expanded State Powers in Antitrust Fight
May 11, 2026 by
CPI
Shein Accuses Temu of Mass Copyright Infringement in UK Legal Battle
May 11, 2026 by
CPI
Fed Survey Finds Increased Worries About AI’s Impact on Financial Stability
May 11, 2026 by
CPI
OpenAI Offers EU Access to New Cyber Model as Anthropic Talks Continue
May 11, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Unilateral Effects
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
A Net Present Value Approach to Merger Analysis
Apr 28, 2026 by
Joseph J Simons & Malcolm Coate
Generative AI and Competitive Disruption: Increasingly Relevant for Merger Analysis?
Apr 28, 2026 by
Andrea Coscelli, Emily Chissell, Nitika Bagaria & Tega Akati-Udi
Non-Price Unilateral Effects In Media Mergers
Apr 28, 2026 by
Lapo Filistrucchi & Teresa Oriani
Ecosystem Mergers and Unilateral Effects? A Framework for Assessing the Ecosystem Theory of Harm
Apr 28, 2026 by
Ethel Fonseca, George Tucker & Helder Vasconcelos