FTC settlement good for consumers, clarifies regulations, says antitrust lawyer
Antitrust attorney David Balto argues in the wake of the unanimous decision by the Federal Trade Commission to end its antitrust case against Google that, while controversial, the end result is “certainly good for consumers.” What’s more, Balto argues that the longstanding investigation into Google – and its outcome announced Thursday – shows the strength of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission in its negotiating tactics, which he says ultimately clarified FRAND commitment enforcement by regulators. The result is, according to Balto, “a great first step to eliminate the opacity, posturing and gamesmanship present in high-tech patent litigation.”
Featured News
EU’s Largest Economies Push to Reduce Reliance on Foreign Payment Systems
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
Warren Presses Amazon for Answers on Pricing Practices for Government Buyers
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Chief Raises Concerns Over Big Tech Control of AI
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
Burson Adds Senior Advisor to Strengthen Competition Team
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Pork Processors for Price-Fixing in Retail Supply Deals
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece