Dec 20, 2012
In recent years, the “leverage theory” of tied good sales has faced heavy and influential criticism. In an important sense, though, the models used by its critics are actually incapable of addressing the leverage theory’s central concerns. Here I reconsider the leverage hypothesis and argue that tying can indeed serve as a mechanism for leveraging market power. The mechanism through which this leverage occurs, its profitability, and its welfare implications are discussed in detail.
Featured News
Pierre Cardin Partner Loses Bid to Scrap EU Antitrust Fine
May 6, 2026 by
CPI
Colorado, Once a Startup Haven, Now Faces Exodus
May 6, 2026 by
CPI
IBM CEO Calls for AI Regulation That Protects Innovation
May 6, 2026 by
CPI
SCOTUS Rejects Apple Bid to Pause App Store Contempt Order in Epic Games Dispute
May 6, 2026 by
CPI
Arnold & Porter Strengthens London Competition Team
May 6, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Unilateral Effects
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
A Net Present Value Approach to Merger Analysis
Apr 28, 2026 by
Joseph J Simons & Malcolm Coate
Generative AI and Competitive Disruption: Increasingly Relevant for Merger Analysis?
Apr 28, 2026 by
Andrea Coscelli, Emily Chissell, Nitika Bagaria & Tega Akati-Udi
Non-Price Unilateral Effects In Media Mergers
Apr 28, 2026 by
Lapo Filistrucchi & Teresa Oriani
Ecosystem Mergers and Unilateral Effects? A Framework for Assessing the Ecosystem Theory of Harm
Apr 28, 2026 by
Ethel Fonseca, George Tucker & Helder Vasconcelos