Ralph Winter, Apr 01, 2006
In this rejoinder, the author first responds to the discussion in Cooper, Froeb, O’Brien, and Vita’s Reply to Winter of a technical point, the relationship between retailer incentives and retailer margins, and then sets out their common ground and remaining differences on the broader theme of theory and evidence in vertical restraints cases. Cooper et al. stated in their original article that a retailer will provide a lower level of effort than is optimal for the manufacturer when the retailer’s margin is small relative to the manufacturer’s margin. The author claimed in his comment on the article that low retail margins do not necessarily lead to inadequate retailer incentives for promotion.
Featured News
Trump Administration Defends Pentagon Blacklisting of AI Firm Anthropic in Court Filing
Mar 18, 2026 by
CPI
BMG Sues Anthropic Over Alleged Use of Song Lyrics in AI Training
Mar 18, 2026 by
CPI
Google Proposes New Search Controls Amid UK Competition Scrutiny
Mar 18, 2026 by
CPI
US Appeals Court Revives Whistleblower Case Against Major Drugmakers Over Pricing Program
Mar 18, 2026 by
CPI
Possible Compromise Emerging on Stablecoin Yield Payments in Senate Market-Structure Bill
Mar 18, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece