
Albertsons has announced it is abandoning its proposed $24.6 billion merger with Kroger and is taking legal action against the grocery giant, accusing it of failing to secure regulatory approval for the deal. This decision comes just one day after federal and state courts issued rulings blocking the merger.
Court Rulings Derail Merger
On Tuesday, U.S. District Court Judge Adrienne Nelson granted a preliminary injunction against the merger following a three-week hearing in Portland, Oregon. Within hours, Washington state Judge Marshall Ferguson issued a permanent injunction, citing concerns that the merger would reduce competition in the state and violate consumer protection laws.
According to Axios, these legal setbacks marked a significant blow to what was poised to be the largest grocery merger in U.S. history. The proposed union between Kroger and Albertsons, which operate in 22 states, was intended to bolster their competitiveness against retail giants like Walmart, Amazon, and Costco.
Regulatory Pushback
The merger faced mounting opposition from regulators, including the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which filed a lawsuit earlier this year to block the deal. The FTC argued that the merger would lead to higher prices for consumers and lower wages for workers by reducing competition. It also criticized the companies’ plan to sell 579 stores to C&S Wholesale Grocers, asserting that the divestiture strategy was insufficient and that C&S lacked the capacity to handle such a large acquisition.
Related: Judge Halts Kroger-Albertsons Merger Over Antitrust Concerns
Allegations of Breach of Contract
Albertsons now alleges that Kroger breached their merger agreement by failing to address antitrust concerns. The company contends that Kroger refused to divest assets that could have satisfied regulatory requirements, ignored feedback from regulators, and rejected alternative buyers for divested stores who were deemed more capable.
In a statement issued Wednesday, Tom Moriarty, Albertsons’ general counsel, criticized Kroger’s handling of the process, saying, “Kroger’s self-serving conduct, taken at the expense of Albertsons and the agreed transaction, has harmed Albertsons’ shareholders, associates, and consumers.”
Kroger Responds
Kroger has denied Albertsons’ claims, stating it “disagrees in the strongest possible terms.” The company accused Albertsons of engaging in “repeated intentional material breaches and interference throughout the merger process,” according to Axios.
Fallout and Next Steps
The failed merger highlights the challenges of navigating antitrust scrutiny in an era of heightened regulatory oversight. While the lawsuit between the two grocery chains unfolds, the incident underscores the complexities and risks associated with large-scale corporate mergers in competitive industries.
Featured News
CFPB Allows Some Operations to Resume Amid Legal Challenge
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
NASCAR Accuses Michael Jordan’s Race Team of Illegal Cartel in Legal Battle
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare Providers Sue BCBS Insurers Over Alleged Collusion
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Indian Distributors File Antitrust Case Against Quick-Delivery Giants
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
EU Lawmakers Send Letter Rejecting Claims of Bias in Digital Rules
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li