Apple has formally requested to participate in the upcoming antitrust trial targeting Google’s dominance in the online search market, citing concerns over its lucrative revenue-sharing agreements with the tech giant. According to Reuters, these agreements, which make Google the default search engine on Apple’s Safari browser, generate billions of dollars for the iPhone maker each year.
In court documents filed on Monday in Washington, Apple revealed that it does not intend to build its own search engine, regardless of whether the agreements with Google continue. The tech giant’s lawyers noted that Apple received an estimated $20 billion from Google under the arrangement in 2022 alone, per Reuters.
Apple has also expressed an interest in calling witnesses to testify during the trial, scheduled for April. The Department of Justice and state prosecutors are expected to argue that Google’s practices have stifled competition in the online search industry. Measures proposed by prosecutors include breaking up key parts of Google’s business, such as the Chrome browser and the Android operating system.
Read more: Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
“Google can no longer adequately represent Apple’s interests: Google must now defend against a broad effort to break up its business units,” Apple stated in its filings. This highlights the company’s concern about its agreements being caught in the crossfire of the Justice Department’s case against Google.
Google has indicated a willingness to modify some aspects of its default agreements with browser developers, device manufacturers, and wireless carriers. However, the company has not proposed ending its revenue-sharing deals, which are central to its partnerships with companies like Apple.
This high-profile trial is being closely watched, as its outcome could significantly alter the competitive landscape of online search and how users access information.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Prime Therapeutics Found in Violation of Antitrust Laws, Arbitrator Rules
Jan 23, 2025 by
CPI
Honda and Nissan Face Challenges in China Amid Potential Merger
Jan 23, 2025 by
CPI
Trump Criticizes EU’s Tech Crackdown, Calls It ‘A Form of Taxation’
Jan 23, 2025 by
CPI
Meta Faces Fresh Allegations of EU Law Breaches in Subscription Service Rollout
Jan 23, 2025 by
CPI
European Commission Investigates Crypto Rules for Cross-Border Stablecoins
Jan 23, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – International Criminal Enforcement
Jan 23, 2025 by
CPI
The Antitrust Division’s Recent Work to Combat International Cartels
Jan 23, 2025 by
Emma Burnham & Benjamin Christenson
Information Sharing: The New Frontier of U.S. Antitrust Enforcement
Jan 23, 2025 by
Brian P. Quinn, Casey Kovarik & Michael Tubach
The Key Role of Guidelines on Exchanges of Information Among Competitors and the Divergent Transatlantic Paths
Jan 23, 2025 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz & Albert Metz
Leniency, Whistleblowers, and Compliance
Jan 23, 2025 by
Richard Powers, Tara O’Malley & Cory Gordon