Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development (1950)(reprint)
Dec 20, 2013
To have the incentive to undertake research and development, a firm must be able to appropriate returns sufficient to make the investment worthwhile. The benefits consumers derive from an innovation, however, are increased if competitors can imitate and improve on the innovation to ensure its availability on favorable terms. Patent law seeks to resolve this tension between incentives for innovation and widespread diffusion of benefits. A patent confers, in theory, perfect appropriability (monopoly of the invention) for a limited time in return for a public disclosure that ensures, again in theory, widespread diffusion of benefits when the patent expires.
Featured News
Starbucks Explored Chipotle Takeover in Potential Restaurant Megadeal
Oct 8, 2026 by
CPI
MMG Challenges EU Antitrust Case Against $500 Million Nickel Deal
Oct 8, 2026 by
CPI
Block, Parent of Cash App and Square, Faces FTC Probe Over Frozen Accounts
Oct 8, 2026 by
CPI
Michigan Sues Blue Cross Blue Shield Over Alleged Antitrust Violations
Oct 8, 2026 by
CPI
AkzoNobel, Axalta Near EU Approval for $25 Billion Merger
Oct 8, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – National Security
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
National Security in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement: Toward a More Disciplined Framework
Sep 22, 2026 by
Rod Rosenstein & Timothy Finley
The Department of War’s M&A Review Guidance: What Companies in the Defense Industry Need to Know
Sep 22, 2026 by
Eric Stocking & Paul Ney
National Security, Resilience and the Boundaries of Merger Control
Sep 22, 2026 by
Beatriz Marques
National Security and Competition: Building Resilient Telecommunications Networks
Sep 22, 2026 by
Roslyn Layton