A PYMNTS Company

Australia’s Car Industry Presses ACCC to Focus on Electric Vehicles

 |  October 21, 2024

The Victorian Automotive Chamber of Commerce (VACC) has made a strong appeal to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) ahead of its 2024 Strategic Review. In its submission, the VACC urged the regulatory body to address critical challenges facing the automotive industry, including electric vehicle (EV) education, warranty claims, service data access, and environmental marketing claims.

VACC emphasized the need for increased regulatory involvement to support both automotive businesses and consumers, as the sector navigates significant shifts driven by the rise of electric vehicles and changing market demands.

Electric Vehicle Education

A key issue raised by the VACC is the growing gap in consumer knowledge regarding electric vehicle maintenance. The chamber called for the ACCC to play a role in educating consumers on the servicing needs and associated costs of EVs. According to a Business Insider report, the VACC is particularly concerned about misinformation that could mislead consumers about the lower maintenance needs of EVs compared to traditional vehicles. The chamber believes that clear communication will be essential as the industry adapts to the rising adoption of electric vehicles.

This push comes amid projections that the global market for hybrid and electric vehicle insurance will expand by 16.88% annually through 2030. As reported by HTF Market Intelligence, the rapid growth in EV adoption has created demand for specialized insurance products that address unique risks, such as battery replacement and charging infrastructure.

Read more: Australians Face Increased Stamp Prices Following ACCC Approval

Warranty and Recall Processes

The VACC also highlighted ongoing challenges with warranty reimbursement, stressing that dealers continue to face delays or outright refusals from manufacturers in compensation for warranty-related work. In its submission, the chamber urged the ACCC to step in and enforce fair practices, ensuring that dealers are fairly reimbursed for warranty claims, product defects, and vehicle recalls.

Despite some progress under the Motor Vehicle Service and Repair Information Scheme, the VACC argued that more work is needed. The chamber called for the ACCC to uphold the “fair and reasonable” standard for accessing service and repair data, ensuring that third-party data providers comply with safety standards. This, it said, would help create a more equitable system for both dealerships and independent service providers.

Environmental Claims and Consumer Protection

Another area of concern raised by the VACC relates to environmental claims made by manufacturers, particularly around electric vehicles. The chamber warned that some manufacturers are making misleading claims about the environmental benefits of EVs, which could inflate consumer expectations and lead to future legal challenges.

According to Business Insider, the VACC recommended that the ACCC take a proactive approach in regulating such claims, ensuring that companies present accurate information to the public. By doing so, they believe the ACCC can help protect consumers from deceptive marketing while maintaining the integrity of the growing EV market.

Federal Appeals Court Temporarily Halts Ruling in Consumer Bureau Battle Federal Appeals Court Temporarily Halts Ruling in CFPB Battle

Federal Appeals Court Temporarily Halts Ruling in Consumer Bureau Battle

 |  April 3, 2025

A federal appeals court on Thursday temporarily put on hold a lower court ruling that had delivered a significant victory to government employees and consumer advocates opposing President Donald Trump’s efforts to curtail the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). According to Reuters, the decision maintains a temporary pause while the court considers an emergency request from the Justice Department to overturn the previous ruling entirely.

The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia stopped short of reversing any provisions set forth by U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in her March 28 ruling. Per Reuters, her decision had ordered the CFPB to reinstate dismissed employees, restore canceled contracts, and continue performing its legally mandated duties. However, the appellate judges left in place interim measures preventing the administration from taking further action against agency staff or halting essential operations.

Despite the temporary stay, the three-judge panel emphasized that the decision should not be interpreted as an indication of their final ruling. “The purpose of this administrative stay is to give the court sufficient opportunity to consider the emergency motion for stay pending appeal and should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits of that motion,” the order stated, according to Reuters.

Related: CFPB Allows Some Operations to Resume Amid Legal Challenge

The Justice Department formally notified the court on Saturday of its intent to challenge Judge Berman Jackson’s order, seeking to overturn her directive that prevented the administration from erasing agency data, terminating employees, or discontinuing active contracts. The Trump administration’s moves against the CFPB began in February when the president dismissed the agency’s director and granted officials from Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency extensive access to sensitive CFPB data systems. The actions resulted in widespread layoffs, contract cancellations, and office closures, prompting consumer protection groups and affected workers to file a lawsuit denouncing the changes as unlawful.

According to Reuters, agency leadership has since attempted to walk back some of these measures, a move Judge Berman Jackson described as likely “a charade for the court’s benefit.” While the appeals court’s temporary stay keeps aspects of the lower court’s ruling in place for now, the broader legal battle over the CFPB’s future remains unresolved.

Source: Reuters