Sao Paulo’s Federal Prosecutors Office announced on Oct. 27 it has filed a civil action against six Brazilian cement companies for allegedly engaging in price fixing between 1987 and 2007.
The companies mentioned in the announcement include Votorantim Cimentos, InterCement Paricipacoes and Lafarge Holcim, which is in process of being acquired by steel producer Companhia Siderurgica Naciona.
The amount of damages indicated in the action include economic losses of BRL28.9 billion and collective moral damages to society of at least BRL10 billion. At this time, there is a high degree of uncertainty as to whether this legal measure will be successful, and if successful, how the amount would be divided among the companies, according to Fitch Ratings.
The alleged damages are material relative to the cash flow of several of these companies. An adverse outcome could have negative credit implications, depending on the timing, payment structure and ultimate amount allocated to each company.
Historically, several Brazilian companies that faced large tax or legal claims had financial outcomes that resulted in obligations that were much lower than the original claim with payment periods spread out over a number of years.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Veteran Lawyers Launch Boutique Antitrust Firm in NY and DC
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU’s Top Court Upholds Antitrust Veto on Thyssenkrupp-Tata Steel Deal
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil’s Court Delays X’s Return Over Fine Payment Dispute
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Tencent and Guillemot Family Consider Potential Buyout of Ubisoft
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Second Price-Fixing Case Against Hotel-Casinos Dismissed by Federal Judge
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh