The Competition Bureau is urging policy makers in British Columbia (BC) to re-think provincial taxi regulations and make them better for consumers and businesses alike by applying the principles of competition.
In line with its report on Modernizing Regulation in the Canadian Taxi Industry, the Bureau encourages BC’s Select Standing Committee on Crown Corporations to level the playing field for taxis and ride-sharing providers, allowing them to compete more effectively with each other for passengers.
In response to the committee’s request for comment, the Bureau made the following evidence-based recommendations:
1. Ensure that regulations are fair and do not favor either taxi providers or ride-sharing platforms;
2. Provide drivers with the flexibility to choose their own service areas, rather than requiring drivers to stay within limited geographic boundaries;
3. Allow market forces to determine how many drivers are available to serve passengers; and
4. Let pricing be determined by market forces to ensure the best outcomes for both drivers and passengers.
The Bureau believes that applying these recommendations will increase competition in the BC ride-hailing industry. Increased competition generally leads to more innovative products, lower prices, and higher quality services.
Full Content: Canada
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Elite US Universities Face New Antitrust Suit Over Financial Aid Practices
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
Kirkland & Ellis Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner from FTC
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
TikTok Hit with Lawsuits from 13 US States and DC
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
Merck Wins Antitrust Immunity in Mumps Vaccine Case, U.S. Court Rules
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
UK Government Launches New Agency to Fast-Track Tech Regulation
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh