By Bruce M. Owen (Stanford University)
Media of communication present challenges to regulators and antitrust analysts. While it has become traditional to view media as “platforms” that support “multi-sided markets,” it is far from clear that media markets for inputs and outputs are usefully treated as belonging to a new and unique category of business enterprise. Most firms produce multiple products or services and make or buy multiple inputs. A price change for any one of these inputs or outputs affects the demand and supply of all other inputs and outputs, either through demand or supply relationships or both. Media are different from other firms because they supply goods that are non-rivalrous, subject to network effects and important to political processes. Calling such firms “platforms” and subjecting them to an analytical island reserved for “multi-sided markets” does not advance our understanding of media antitrust and regulatory policy issues.
Featured News
T-Mobile Faces Class-Action Lawsuit Over Sprint Merger After Appeal Denied
May 16, 2024 by
CPI
Google Faces Backlash Over Introduction of AI-Generated Summaries in Searches
May 16, 2024 by
CPI
CMA Launches Phase 2 Probe into AlphaTheta’s Acquisition of Serato
May 16, 2024 by
CPI
NFL Executive Escapes Testifying in High-Stakes Trial Over Televised Games
May 16, 2024 by
CPI
EU Consumers Lodge Complaint Against Chinese Retailer Temu Over Content Rules Breach
May 16, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI