
European Union antitrust regulators have launched a series of raids on unidentified financial services companies suspected of involvement in a cartel linked to derivatives trading. According to Bloomberg, the raids were carried out across two EU member states, targeting firms potentially engaged in anti-competitive practices related to financial derivatives.
The Brussels-based European Commission, which oversees antitrust enforcement within the bloc, stated that the firms under scrutiny are believed to be involved in activities that may breach EU competition rules. These rules prohibit business practices that restrict competition, and any violations could lead to significant penalties. Per Bloomberg, fines for firms found guilty of such violations could reach up to 10% of their global annual revenue.
The raids mark the latest chapter in a long-running EU crackdown on the financial industry, specifically addressing concerns about cartel behavior. In previous investigations, regulators uncovered instances where traders exchanged sensitive information in online chat rooms, leading to significant penalties for several major financial institutions. These investigations, which span over a decade, have already resulted in billions of euros in fines across the industry.
The scrutiny of derivatives trading comes at a time when financial markets remain under close watch by regulators, particularly after the financial crisis of 2008. Following the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the EU approved extensive government aid to stabilize European banks, prompting greater oversight and stricter rules governing financial institutions. This latest investigation, while still in its early stages, could result in further enforcement actions if wrongdoing is confirmed.
There is no set timetable for the European Commission to conclude its investigation. Bloomberg notes that EU antitrust probes can often take several years to complete, particularly in complex cases like those involving the financial sector.
Source: Bloomberg
Featured News
CFPB Allows Some Operations to Resume Amid Legal Challenge
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
NASCAR Accuses Michael Jordan’s Race Team of Illegal Cartel in Legal Battle
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare Providers Sue BCBS Insurers Over Alleged Collusion
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Indian Distributors File Antitrust Case Against Quick-Delivery Giants
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
EU Lawmakers Send Letter Rejecting Claims of Bias in Digital Rules
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li