European Union antitrust regulators have launched a series of raids on unidentified financial services companies suspected of involvement in a cartel linked to derivatives trading. According to Bloomberg, the raids were carried out across two EU member states, targeting firms potentially engaged in anti-competitive practices related to financial derivatives.
The Brussels-based European Commission, which oversees antitrust enforcement within the bloc, stated that the firms under scrutiny are believed to be involved in activities that may breach EU competition rules. These rules prohibit business practices that restrict competition, and any violations could lead to significant penalties. Per Bloomberg, fines for firms found guilty of such violations could reach up to 10% of their global annual revenue.
The raids mark the latest chapter in a long-running EU crackdown on the financial industry, specifically addressing concerns about cartel behavior. In previous investigations, regulators uncovered instances where traders exchanged sensitive information in online chat rooms, leading to significant penalties for several major financial institutions. These investigations, which span over a decade, have already resulted in billions of euros in fines across the industry.
The scrutiny of derivatives trading comes at a time when financial markets remain under close watch by regulators, particularly after the financial crisis of 2008. Following the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the EU approved extensive government aid to stabilize European banks, prompting greater oversight and stricter rules governing financial institutions. This latest investigation, while still in its early stages, could result in further enforcement actions if wrongdoing is confirmed.
There is no set timetable for the European Commission to conclude its investigation. Bloomberg notes that EU antitrust probes can often take several years to complete, particularly in complex cases like those involving the financial sector.
Source: Bloomberg
Featured News
Veteran Lawyers Launch Boutique Antitrust Firm in NY and DC
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU’s Top Court Upholds Antitrust Veto on Thyssenkrupp-Tata Steel Deal
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil’s Court Delays X’s Return Over Fine Payment Dispute
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Tencent and Guillemot Family Consider Potential Buyout of Ubisoft
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Second Price-Fixing Case Against Hotel-Casinos Dismissed by Federal Judge
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh