On Friday, December 8, Brussels ordered the International Skating Union (ISU) to change its rules after deciding its threat of a lifetime ban was an “extreme” restriction on speed skaters.
The EU said that threatening a lifetime ban for athletes participating in unapproved events served to protect the ISU’s “commercial interests and prevent others from setting up their own events.”
Margrethe Vestager, European Competition Commissioner said “International sports federations play an important role in athletes’ careers – they protect their health and safety and the integrity of competitions. However, the severe penalties the International Skating Union imposes on skaters also serve to protect its own commercial interests and prevent others from setting up their own events.”
Sporting bodies can limit an athlete’s participation if they have objective concerns about an outside event — for example safety, anti-doping or match-fixing. However penalties for breaking those rules need to be proportionate. The Commission found the ISU’s rules were “disproportionately punitive”, deprived athletes of “additional sources of income during their relatively short speed skating careers” and prevented “the emergence of independent international speed skating competitions.”
Full Content: Europa & Reuters
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
EU Tech Firms Advocate for Sovereign Infrastructure Fund to Boost Tech Independence
Mar 17, 2025 by
CPI
Trump Administration Seeks to Extend Deadlines in U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel Lawsuit
Mar 17, 2025 by
CPI
DOJ Antitrust Chief to Review Costly Consultants Amid Spending Cuts
Mar 17, 2025 by
CPI
DOJ Antitrust Chief Gail Slater Assembles Veteran Team for Key Cases
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
UK Demands Access to Apple’s Encrypted Cloud Data, Spark Legal and Privacy Battle
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li