In a bid to address concerns raised by various stakeholders, the European Union (EU) has drafted a paper proposing exceptions to certain provisions outlined in the Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) bill. The bill, which was unanimously passed by the EU last year, has been hailed as a landmark piece of legislation aimed at regulating the burgeoning crypto industry.
MiCA, a component of the broader Digital Operational Resilience for the Financial Sector (DORA) framework, has garnered attention for its comprehensive approach to regulating crypto assets and related services. However, concerns have emerged regarding its potential impact on innovation and market accessibility.
The proposed exceptions, outlined in the paper submitted by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), seek to strike a balance between regulatory oversight and market flexibility. One key provision of the paper pertains to allowing non-EU companies to offer crypto assets and services to EU citizens under certain circumstances.
Previously, MiCA aimed to restrict non-EU entities from providing such services within the EU jurisdiction. However, the proposed exceptions would permit these companies to cater to EU customers through a mechanism known as reverse solicitation. This entails the provision of services or assets to EU citizens only upon explicit request from the individual, thereby ensuring a degree of consumer choice while upholding regulatory standards.
Read more: European Commission Says MiCA Oversight Would Have Prevented FTX Collapse
The rationale behind these exceptions is twofold. On one hand, it seeks to accommodate experienced crypto investors who may seek specialized services not readily available within the EU. By allowing non-EU providers to offer such services under specific conditions, the EU aims to prevent market fragmentation and promote competition.
On the other hand, the exceptions also aim to safeguard less experienced investors from potential risks associated with dealing with non-EU entities. By requiring explicit solicitation from the consumer, the EU intends to mitigate the likelihood of individuals unknowingly engaging with entities operating outside its regulatory purview, where legal recourse may be limited.
The drafting of the paper follows two consultation sessions held earlier, with another scheduled for April, underscoring the EU’s commitment to engaging with stakeholders and refining regulatory frameworks in response to feedback. The provisions outlined in the paper are expected to be incorporated into MiCA, with the legislation set to take effect in phases starting June 2024.
Source: Crypto Potato
Featured News
Mastercard Settlement Faces Challenge in Landmark Consumer Case
Dec 4, 2024 by
CPI
Novartis Loses Appeal to Delay US Launch of Entresto Generic
Dec 4, 2024 by
CPI
UK Delays Provisional Findings in Cloud Market Probe to January
Dec 4, 2024 by
CPI
EU Probes Nvidia Over Alleged Bundling Practices Amid Run:ai Acquisition Scrutiny
Dec 4, 2024 by
CPI
Supreme Court Asked to Weigh In on Major Rail Access Antitrust Case
Dec 4, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Moats & Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Assessing the Potential for Antitrust Moats and Trenches in the Generative AI Industry
Nov 29, 2024 by
Allison Holt, Sushrut Jain & Ashley Zhou
How SEP Hold-up Can Lead to Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
Jay Jurata, Elena Kamenir & Christie Boyden
The Role of Moats in Unlocking Economic Growth
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Overcoming Moats and Entrenchment: Disruptive Innovation in Generative AI May Be More Successful than Regulation
Nov 29, 2024 by
Simon Chisholm & Charlie Whitehead