
Meta, the parent company of Facebook, has been fined €798 million by the European Commission for allegedly abusing its market position to promote Facebook Marketplace, its classified ads service. According to The New York Times, the EU’s executive branch claims that Meta unfairly linked Marketplace to its social network, Facebook, and imposed restrictive terms on rival advertising platforms. The Commission has ordered Meta to end these practices.
Per a statement from the Commission, Meta’s integration of Marketplace into Facebook gives the platform an edge that competitors cannot match. Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager stated in an email that the company worked “to benefit its own service Facebook Marketplace, thereby giving it advantages that other online classified ads service providers could not match.” This substantial antitrust fine, the first of its kind for Meta, builds on an earlier €110 million penalty in 2017, when the company was found to have supplied incorrect data in the EU’s review of its WhatsApp acquisition.
In response, Meta has expressed its intent to appeal. According to The New York Times, the company said in a blog post that it would “comply, and will work quickly and constructively to launch a solution which addresses the points raised.” However, Meta also expressed disappointment with the regulatory action, stating that it discourages innovation in a space “built to meet consumer demand” and called for European regulators to support competitive, forward-thinking policies.
Read more: Judge Rules Meta Must Face FTC Antitrust Trial Over Instagram, WhatsApp Acquisitions
This investigation into Meta’s Marketplace practices began in June 2021, prompted by complaints from competing classified ads services. According to The New York Times, rival companies argued that Meta improperly linked Marketplace to its dominant social network and used non-public advertising data to enhance Marketplace. In addition, Meta’s presence in social media and online advertising gives it what the Commission considers a commanding advantage over other digital ad platforms within the EU.
A similar probe was conducted in the United Kingdom last year by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), which ended its investigation after Meta made concessions regarding how it handles advertisers’ data. The European Union’s recent fine also follows Meta’s decision to revise its controversial pay-or-consent model for Facebook and Instagram services, in response to pressure from EU antitrust and data-protection officials.
According to The New York Times, the European Commission had previously cautioned Meta that its subscription model might breach the Digital Markets Act (DMA), as it could restrict user choice over data usage. German regulators had also taken action in 2017, ordering Meta to cease tracking users outside its social network, calling such data collection practices abusive.
Meta has also initiated a legal challenge against the European Commission’s classification of Facebook Marketplace as a core platform service under the DMA, a designation that could severely restrict Meta’s ability to process user data.
As European regulators take an increasingly proactive approach to enforcing competition laws within the tech sector, the €798 million fine serves as a clear message to digital giants.
Source: The New York Times

In the wake of sweeping antitrust raids by Indian authorities, leading advertising agencies have been cautioned against sharing sensitive commercial information through informal communication channels, including WhatsApp, according to a document cited by Reuters.
The advisory, issued by the Advertising Agencies Association of India (AAAI), follows surprise inspections carried out by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) on March 18. These dawn raids were part of a broader investigation into alleged price collusion and discount manipulation in India’s $18.5 billion advertising industry—one of the fastest-growing globally and currently ranked the eighth largest by revenue, Reuters reported.
The CCI’s actions have rattled the country’s dynamic advertising ecosystem, especially the broadcast and digital streaming sectors, where major players like Reliance-Disney and Sony dominate. The probe is likely to have a lasting impact on how media buying is structured and priced in India, particularly among global agencies operating in the region.
The AAAI, whose membership includes prominent firms such as GroupM (owned by WPP), Japan’s Dentsu, and France’s Publicis, has urged its affiliates to steer clear of discussions involving pricing or any other commercially sensitive data. In an advisory dated March 26 and prepared by legal firm Trilegal, the association emphasized that members must exit existing WhatsApp groups and cease any form of such communication, per Reuters.
Related: WhatsApp Secures EU Court Adviser’s Backing in Privacy Fine Dispute
The document explicitly warned, “Members are requested not to discuss (through any mechanism, including emails, WhatsApp groups, documents, any informal, or formal meetings), any commercially sensitive information.” This includes pricing strategies, which could fall afoul of India’s competition regulations.
The CCI’s probe was reportedly triggered by leniency applications, a mechanism that incentivizes whistleblowers with reduced penalties in exchange for evidence of anti-competitive behavior. Among those cooperating with the investigation is Dentsu, which reportedly submitted internal findings of collusion along with a 2023 procedural document jointly issued by the IBDF (Indian Broadcasting and Digital Foundation) and AAAI, according to Reuters.
The March raids also extended to the offices of the IBDF in New Delhi, a powerful industry body representing major broadcasters. The investigation remains ongoing, and the CCI typically does not disclose details until a case reaches completion—a process that can take years.
While the CCI, AAAI, and involved media buying agencies have not responded to Reuters inquiries, Trilegal declined to comment, citing ongoing legal proceedings. The advisory from AAAI stressed that any form of coordination involving sensitive business data could raise red flags under India’s competition laws and expose parties to further enforcement action.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Indian Ad Agencies Warned Against WhatsApp Discussions After Antitrust Raids
Apr 17, 2025 by
CPI
US Court Ruling Against Google Spurs Fresh Antitrust Tensions in Europe
Apr 17, 2025 by
CPI
AstraZeneca Accused of Stifling Biosimilar Competition for Rare Disease Drug
Apr 17, 2025 by
CPI
EU AI Act Technical Standards Delayed Until Next Year
Apr 17, 2025 by
CPI
Justice Department Appoints New Trustee to Oversee T-Mobile/Sprint Deal
Apr 17, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Airline Industry
Apr 10, 2025 by
CPI
Boosting Competition in International Aviation
Apr 10, 2025 by
Jeffrey N. Shane
Reshaping Competition Policy for the U.S. Airline Industry
Apr 10, 2025 by
Diana L. Moss
Algorithmic Collusion in the Skies: The Role of AI in Shaping Airline Competition
Apr 10, 2025 by
Qi Ge, Myongjin Kim & Nicholas Rupp
Competition in U.S. Airline Markets: Major Developments and Economic Insights
Apr 10, 2025 by
Germán Bet