
European Union lawmakers have voiced strong objections to Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager’s decision to finalize candidates for a crucial antitrust role just weeks before the current Commission’s term concludes, according to POLITICO. The European Commission is set to conduct its final round of interviews for the chief competition economist position on Tuesday, with Vestager personally overseeing this stage.
Lawmakers including German Social Democrat René Repasi and Green MEP Alexandra Geese have criticized Vestager for making this key appointment so close to the end of her tenure. Repasi argued that the choice should be left to the incoming Commissioner, who may have differing views on competition policy. “This move seems to be an attempt to cement her political legacy, rather than allowing the new Commissioner to make a choice reflective of their own priorities,” Repasi told POLITICO.
The appointment process has been particularly contentious following the withdrawal of Fiona Scott Morton, a prominent U.S. economist, due to backlash from French officials over the decision to bring in an American to oversee EU antitrust matters. “Vice President Vestager should avoid influencing the future Commission’s competition policies,” Geese commented, emphasizing the importance of the chief economist role in achieving European digital autonomy.
Read more: Vestager Steps Down, Reynders Takes Charge of EU Competition Policy
Even within Vestager’s own political circle, concerns have emerged. French liberal MEP Stéphanie Yon-Courtin questioned the urgency of the appointment. “It’s been a year without a chief economist, so why the rush now?” she asked. Yon-Courtin suggested that delaying the decision could allow for a more thorough and less contentious selection process.
The position has been vacant since Pierre Régibeau’s retirement in August 2023, with Lluís Saurí serving as acting chief economist in the interim. The European Commission only reopened the vacancy in March, requiring candidates to be EU citizens. The role, once seen as purely technical, has gained significant political relevance as it affects EU competition policy and its impact on the bloc’s industrial strategy.
Source: Politico
Featured News
China Summons Delivery Giants Over Unfair Competition Concerns
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
Judge Orders Sanctions Against Missouri for Noncompliance in Price-Fixing Probe
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
Confusion Reigns In AI Policy In US and Europe
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
EU Clears ADNOC’s $16.3 Billion Acquisition of Covestro
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
Spanish Antitrust Chief Says BBVA-Sabadell Merger Won’t Stifle Competition
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece