
A federal grand jury in Sherman returned a superseding indictment charging two Texas men with engaging in wage fixing and obstructing a federal investigation, announced Acting US Attorney Nicholas J. Ganjei on Monday, April 19.
Neeraj Jindal, the former owner of a Texas-based therapist staffing company, and John Rodgers, a physical therapist and the clinical director of Jindal’s company, are charged with conspiring to fix prices, in violation of the Sherman Act, and with conspiring to obstruct a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) investigation. Both defendants are also charged with obstruction of an FTC investigation.
According to the four-count superseding indictment, in 2017, Jindal, Rodgers, and their co-conspirators agreed to pay lower rates to certain physical therapists and physical therapist assistants in North Texas. Their company, in turn, paid the agreed lower rates for several months after entering into the agreement.
Jindal and Rodgers also conspired to obstruct an FTC investigation and to obstruct proceedings occurring before the FTC. In furtherance of the conspiracy, Jindal and Rodgers made false and misleading statements and withheld and concealed information during the FTC’s investigation to determine whether their company or other therapist staffing companies violated the Federal Trade Commission Act.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
O’Melveny Strengthens Brussels Office with Antitrust Partner Return
Mar 17, 2025 by
CPI
EU Tech Firms Advocate for Sovereign Infrastructure Fund to Boost Tech Independence
Mar 17, 2025 by
CPI
Trump Administration Seeks to Extend Deadlines in U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel Lawsuit
Mar 17, 2025 by
CPI
DOJ Antitrust Chief to Review Costly Consultants Amid Spending Cuts
Mar 17, 2025 by
CPI
DOJ Antitrust Chief Gail Slater Assembles Veteran Team for Key Cases
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li