
A federal judge has ruled that Alphabet Inc.’s Google will have to face an antitrust lawsuit filed by a coalition of U.S. states, including Texas, accusing the tech giant of monopolizing the digital advertising sector. U.S. District Judge Sean Jordan, based in Plano, Texas, denied Google’s motion to dismiss the case on Tuesday, allowing the legal battle to proceed.
According to Reuters, the lawsuit was originally filed in 2020 by Texas, alongside 15 other Republican-led states and the U.S. territory of Puerto Rico. The plaintiffs argue that Google has violated antitrust laws by maintaining an illegal monopoly over digital advertising exchanges, where online display ads are bought and sold. The states contend that Google’s control of this key market has enabled it to artificially inflate prices, harming competition and consumers.
Per Reuters, Judge Jordan’s decision rejected Google’s argument that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue. Google, based in Mountain View, California, has consistently denied the allegations and has not responded to requests for comment. The company faces several other legal challenges related to the lawsuit.
Read more: Google Appeals Record €4.12 Billion EU Antitrust Fine Over Android
A lawyer representing Texas expressed satisfaction with the ruling, highlighting the judge’s “careful consideration of the law and facts,” according to Reuters.
The coalition of states involved in the lawsuit includes Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Utah. The trial is currently set to begin in March, though discussions are underway to potentially delay the proceedings until summer. This delay would be contingent on the outcome of a related case in Virginia, where the Justice Department and a coalition of states have brought a separate lawsuit against Google over its advertising technology practices.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Trump Announces 100% Tariffs On ‘Any And All Movies’ Coming Into U.S.
May 5, 2025 by
CPI
Apple Faces New Class Action Over Alleged Defiance of App Store Injunction
May 5, 2025 by
CPI
Sidley Austin Expands Antitrust Bench with Addition of Mary Marks in NY
May 5, 2025 by
CPI
Axinn Expands Antitrust Practice with Addition of Former DOJ Litigator
May 5, 2025 by
CPI
Spain Orders Public Consultation on BBVA’s €13 Billion Sabadell Takeover
May 5, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece