
Google has returned to court to contest a €4.12 billion ($4.33 billion) antitrust fine imposed by the European Commission in 2018. The penalty, one of the largest in the history of EU antitrust enforcement, targeted Google’s Android operating system for allegedly stifling competition.
The tech giant is appealing the decision before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Luxembourg, marking a critical phase in the ongoing legal battle.
According to the Wall Street Journal, the case stems from claims that Google leveraged its dominance by requiring phone manufacturers to pre-install Google Search, the Chrome browser, and the Google Play app store on Android devices. EU regulators argued that these requirements undermined competition and reinforced Google’s market power.
This appeal follows a 2021 decision by a lower EU court, which upheld the European Commission’s ruling but slightly reduced the original fine to €4.1 billion. Google is now seeking a complete reversal, arguing that the Commission misinterpreted both its business practices and their impact on competition.
Read more: Google to Tackle Fake Reviews in the UK, Says Competition Regulator
“Google does not contest or shy away from its responsibility under the law, but the Commission also has a responsibility when it runs investigations, when it seeks to reshape markets and second-guess pro-competitive business models, and when it imposes multi-billion-euro fines,” Google’s lawyer, Alfonso Lamadrid, told the court. Per the Wall Street Journal, Lamadrid contended that Google’s practices, including its agreements with manufacturers, did not hinder competition but instead promoted it through innovation and consumer choice.
The European Commission, however, maintains its position, asserting that Google’s practices created significant barriers for rivals in the mobile operating system and search engine markets. Regulators allege that the company’s contracts effectively excluded alternative systems based on Android from competing on equal footing.
The case, listed as C-738/22 P – Google and Alphabet v Commission
Source: Wall Street Journal
Featured News
Belgian Authorities Detain Multiple Individuals Over Alleged Huawei Bribery in EU Parliament
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Grubhub’s Antitrust Case to Proceed in Federal Court, Second Circuit Rules
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Pharma Giants Mallinckrodt and Endo to Merge in Multi-Billion-Dollar Deal
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Targets Meta’s Market Power, Calls Zuckerberg to Testify
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
French Watchdog Approves Carrefour’s Expansion, Orders Store Sell-Off
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li