Federal Judge Keeps Antitrust Case Against Live Nation in New York, Rejecting Venue Change

A federal judge in New York has ruled that the ongoing antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation Entertainment Inc. and its subsidiary Ticketmaster will proceed in the Southern District of New York, rejecting the defendants’ request to transfer the case to Washington, D.C. According to Bloomberg, this ruling is a significant step forward for the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), which seeks to dismantle what it describes as an illegal monopoly in the live events industry.
In May, the DOJ, alongside nearly 30 state attorneys general, filed a lawsuit against Live Nation, aiming to compel the company to divest Ticketmaster, a giant in the ticketing market. The lawsuit follows years of rising consumer frustration over ticket prices and purchasing processes. Live Nation and Ticketmaster argued that a prior consent decree from their 2010 merger with the DOJ designated the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia as the appropriate venue for any related legal matters. However, the court’s recent decision allows the case to remain in New York, where it will be heard in 2026.
Related: Live Nation May Face Antitrust Lawsuit
The lawsuit accuses Live Nation of monopolistic practices that have significantly increased ticket prices for consumers. This antitrust action comes amid widespread dissatisfaction among fans over the concert-going experience, which has seen ticket costs rise to exorbitant levels, at times equating to a month’s rent for the most sought-after shows. “We are not here today because Live Nation-Ticketmaster’s conduct is inconvenient or frustrating,” said Attorney General Merrick Garland during a press conference in May. “We are here because … that conduct is anticompetitive and illegal. We allege that Live Nation has illegally monopolized markets across the live-concert industry in the United States for far too long. It is time to break it up.”
The DOJ claims that Live Nation’s immense market power allows it to secure lucrative contracts with artists that smaller competitors cannot match. This, they argue, ultimately leads to higher ticket prices as fans bear the burden of the inflated costs associated with these contracts. The company’s promotional business alone reported $4.5 billion in revenue in the third quarter of 2024, surpassing its closest rival, AEG Presents, by more than double, according to Pollstar.
Featured News
Coinbase to Acquire Deribit in Landmark $2.9 Billion Deal
May 9, 2025 by
CPI
Cautious Optimism From AI Execs Over Planned Lifting of Export Controls, But Concerns Remain
May 8, 2025 by
CPI
UK Holds Firm on Digital Tax for US Tech Giants Despite New Trade Deal
May 8, 2025 by
CPI
Pro Tennis Governing Body Barred from Influencing Players in Antitrust Lawsuit
May 8, 2025 by
CPI
Mastercard Wins Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Over Digital Wallet Access
May 8, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece