
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is reportedly probing Uber Technologies Inc. for potential violations of consumer protection laws, particularly concerning its Uber One subscription service. The investigation, which began earlier this year, centers on allegations that the company may have enrolled customers in the service without their explicit consent and made it challenging for users to cancel their subscriptions, according to a report by The Financial Times.
Uber has pushed back against these claims, emphasizing its compliance with legal standards. In a statement to The Financial Times, the company asserted that its cancellation process is designed to be straightforward, claiming that customers can terminate their subscriptions in “20 seconds or less.”
This investigation aligns with a broader push by the FTC to enhance consumer rights in the realm of subscription-based services. As per The Financial Times, the agency recently finalized its “click-to-cancel” rule in October. The new regulation aims to simplify the cancellation process for consumers across various industries, including streaming platforms and fitness memberships. However, the rule is already facing legal challenges, indicating that its implementation may not proceed without obstacles.
Read more: Taiwan’s Ministry of Labor Opposes Uber Eats-Foodpanda Merger
In an unrelated historical footnote reported by Bloomberg, Uber’s legal battles with the FTC date back to the period following the 2016 U.S. presidential election. At that time, the agency reportedly sought a settlement from the ride-hailing giant, which Uber’s legal team described as involving a substantial monetary sum.
This latest inquiry underscores the FTC’s intensified scrutiny of subscription services, particularly those accused of employing potentially deceptive practices to lock in customers. As the investigation unfolds, the outcome could have implications not only for Uber but for the broader subscription-based economy.
Source: The Financial Times
Featured News
Coinbase to Acquire Deribit in Landmark $2.9 Billion Deal
May 9, 2025 by
CPI
Cautious Optimism From AI Execs Over Planned Lifting of Export Controls, But Concerns Remain
May 8, 2025 by
CPI
UK Holds Firm on Digital Tax for US Tech Giants Despite New Trade Deal
May 8, 2025 by
CPI
Pro Tennis Governing Body Barred from Influencing Players in Antitrust Lawsuit
May 8, 2025 by
CPI
Mastercard Wins Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Over Digital Wallet Access
May 8, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece