U.S. District Judge Margo Brodie on Tuesday rejected a $30 billion antitrust settlement involving Visa and Mastercard. The proposed settlement, which aimed to limit fees charged to merchants who accept their credit and debit cards, was not granted preliminary approval, according to a Reuters report.
Judge Brodie’s decision suggests that she is unlikely to approve the settlement in its final form. This move may force Visa and Mastercard to either negotiate a more favorable settlement for merchants or prepare for a trial.
The settlement, initially announced in March, sought to address ongoing litigation that began in 2005 over interchange fees, commonly referred to as swipe fees. These fees, which merchants must pay to accept Visa and Mastercard transactions, are set by the card networks and amounted to approximately $72 billion in 2023, as reported by the Nilson Report.
The swipe fees are a major revenue source for banks and other card issuers, who often reinvest a portion of these fees into rewards programs to encourage increased consumer spending. However, many merchants and retail trade groups argue that the fees, typically ranging from 1.5% to 3.5%, are excessively high. They also object to rules that prevent merchants from disclosing the varying costs of different cards to customers and from steering them towards cheaper payment options.
Read more: Chile’s Competition Tribunal Orders Visa & Mastercard To Alter Payment Practices
Critics of the current fee structure argue that it leads to higher prices for consumers, who may sometimes pay less when using cash. The rejected settlement had proposed to reduce the average swipe fee by at least 0.04 percentage points for three years and maintain a reduction of at least 0.07 percentage points below the current average for five years. Additionally, Visa and Mastercard had agreed to cap rates for five years and eliminate anti-steering provisions, granting merchants greater discretion to offer discounts or impose surcharges.
Despite these concessions, several trade groups, including the National Retail Federation, opposed the settlement. They contended that the proposed relief for merchants was insufficient and temporary, complicating future legal challenges against Visa and Mastercard while still allowing the card networks to set swipe fees. Some U.S. senators have also advocated for the Credit Card Competition Act, which would enable merchants to use alternative payment networks for processing Visa and Mastercard transactions.
This rejection does not impact a separate $5.6 billion class action settlement involving Visa, Mastercard, and around 12 million merchants. This agreement was upheld by a federal appeals court in Manhattan in March 2023, following the overturning of a previous $7.25 billion settlement that had short-changed some retailers.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Google Urges FTC to Breakup of Microsoft’s Exclusive OpenAI Partnership: Report
Dec 10, 2024 by
CPI
Trump Announces Andrew Ferguson as FTC Chair Nominee Amid Antitrust Policy Uncertainty
Dec 10, 2024 by
CPI
Judge Halts Kroger-Albertsons Merger Over Antitrust Concerns
Dec 10, 2024 by
CPI
RealPage Clears DOJ Criminal Investigation, Faces Ongoing Civil Suits
Dec 10, 2024 by
CPI
Nvidia Responds to China’s Antitrust Probe, Vows Full Cooperation
Dec 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Moats & Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Assessing the Potential for Antitrust Moats and Trenches in the Generative AI Industry
Nov 29, 2024 by
Allison Holt, Sushrut Jain & Ashley Zhou
How SEP Hold-up Can Lead to Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
Jay Jurata, Elena Kamenir & Christie Boyden
The Role of Moats in Unlocking Economic Growth
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Overcoming Moats and Entrenchment: Disruptive Innovation in Generative AI May Be More Successful than Regulation
Nov 29, 2024 by
Simon Chisholm & Charlie Whitehead