
The NFL’s consideration of a broadcasting landscape without “Sunday Ticket” in 2017 has resurfaced as a critical element in a class-action lawsuit currently being deliberated by a jury. The plaintiffs, subscribers of “Sunday Ticket,” presented a league memo from April 21, 2017, titled “NFL New Frontier,” during their closing arguments on Wednesday.
The memo, which was shown to the jury, detailed a reimagined approach to Sunday afternoon NFL games, suggesting that all out-of-market games not aired on Fox or CBS could instead be broadcast on cable channels. This proposal would have significantly altered the current broadcasting model, wherein DirecTV has exclusive rights to these games through its “Sunday Ticket” package.
According to the memo, under this new model, Fox and CBS would have paid approximately 25% less per game, equating to around $10 million per game. In contrast, cable networks would have contributed $9 million per game, matching the average payment made by DirecTV under its contract with the NFL.
Related: NFL Faces Antitrust Trial Over ‘Sunday Ticket’ Telecast in Los Angeles
The jury began deliberations on Wednesday afternoon after receiving instructions from U.S. District Judge Philip Gutierrez. The day’s proceedings included the plaintiffs’ closing statement in the morning, followed by the NFL’s final remarks after lunch. The plaintiffs then had a 20-minute rebuttal session. The jury met for 90 minutes before adjourning for the day, with deliberations set to continue on Thursday.
This three-week trial has been marked by high-profile testimonies from NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones. The 2017 memo has emerged as one of the most significant revelations, shedding light on the league’s considerations and potential shifts in its broadcasting strategies.
Source: AP News
Featured News
EU Civil Society Groups and Labor Unions Raise Alarm Over Proposed Changes to GDPR
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Regulators Push Back Deadline on UniCredit’s Takeover Bid for Banco BPM
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
Intel Challenges €376 Million EU Fine in Ongoing Antitrust Dispute
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
Red Bull Challenges EU Commission Over Lengthy Antitrust Inspection
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
Live Nation Under Criminal Antitrust Investigation Over Pandemic-Era Refund Policies
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Healthcare Antitrust
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare & Antitrust: What to Expect in the New Trump Administration
May 14, 2025 by
Nana Wilberforce, John W O'Toole & Sarah Pugh
Patent Gaming and Disparagement: Commission Fines Teva For Improperly Protecting Its Blockbuster Medicine
May 14, 2025 by
Blaž Višnar, Boris Andrejaš, Apostolos Baltzopoulos, Rieke Kaup, Laura Nistor & Gianluca Vassallo
Strategic Alliances in the Pharma Sector: An EU Competition Law Perspective
May 14, 2025 by
Christian Ritz & Benedikt Weiss
Monopsony Power in the Hospital Labor Market
May 14, 2025 by
Kevin E. Pflum & Christian Salas