Lithuanian competition regulator Konkurencijos taryba found that in the public tender of Vilnius city cemetery maintenance services, the firms belonging to the group of companies City Service concluded a cartel agreement with their competitor Naujininkų ūkis. Konkurencijos taryba fined these companies a total of €412,100 (US$462,694).
Konkurencijos taryba received initial claim from Vilnius City Municipality which launched a public tender for the procurement of cemetery maintenance services on May 31, 2018. Having suspected that the competitors Mano aplinka and Naujininkų ūkis concluded a bid-rigging cartel, the Municipality excluded the two companies from participation in a procurement procedure.
Having conducted the investigation, the regulator found that Mano aplinka and Naujininkų ūkis assisted by City Service Engineering, concluded a cartel which restricted competition: the companies agreed to rig their bids, including the prices, and imitated competition in public tender.
When imposing the sanctions, Konkurencijos taryba evaluated the fact that in the course of the infringement, 100% of City Service Engineering shares belonged to the Estonian company City Service. The latter company also had control over 100% of Mano aplinka shares indirectly through Mano Būsto priežiūra (previously Mano Būstas). Since the investigation revealed that City Service had a decisive influence on its subsidiary companies Mano Būsto priežiūra, Mano aplinka, and City Service Engineering, while Mano Būsto priežiūra – on its subsidiary firm Mano aplinka, these two parent companies were found liable for the cartel.
Having evaluated the gravity, duration and other circumstances relating to the infringement, Konkurencijos taryba imposed a joint and several fine of €381,100 (US$427,872) on City Service, Mano Būsto priežiūra, City Service Engineering, and Mano aplinka, and a fine of €31,000 (US$34,803) on Naujininkų ūkis.
Investigation into the conduct of Ecoservice which also participated in the aforementioned tender was closed as no evidence of anti-competitive agreement was established.
The decision of Konkurencijos taryba can be appealed to Vilnius Regional Administrative Court.
Full Content: Emailed Press Release
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Mehta Questions Both Sides in Landmark Google Antitrust Case
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Urges Urgent Funding for Removal of Chinese Telecom Equipment from U.S. Networks
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Former Pioneer CEO Facing Potential Criminal Charges For Colluding With OPEC
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Regulator Greenlights K-Pop Powerhouse Deal
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Exxon’s Pioneer Purchase Approved, Former CEO Barred from Board
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI