Mexico’s eCommerce market is being investigated by the country’s antitrust agency, which on Thursday, February 1, alleged potential monopoly tactics aimed at hurting smaller rivals.
According to a report in Reuters, the Federal Economic Competition Commission (COFECE) issued a statement in which it said it was looking into claims of price discrimination that harmed competitors. The government agency wouldn’t offer more details or name the companies being investigated, although it did reveal the inquiry has been ongoing since the end of September.
“This process should not imply any prejudgment of the responsibility of any economic agent,” the statement said, also noting that companies that are found guilty of monopoly practices may be hit with a fine as high as 8% of revenues. Reuters noted that the country’s leading eCommerce players include Amazon, Mercado Libre of Argentina and Walmart de Mexico.
Currently, eCommerce is a tiny fraction of retail sales in Mexico—only slightly more than 3%, Reuters reported. Most consumers fear credit card fraud and pay with cash. PYMNTS research found that roughly half of all Mexican households do not have access to a bank account and, as a result, rely solely on cash. The same research estimates that cash use in the country will grow at a CAGR of 20.4% between 2016 and 2021.
In October, Amazon launched a new cash payment service in the country in an effort to expand its reach in Mexico and to compete with Walmart de Mexico, also known as Walmex, along with other retailers pushing Mexican consumers to shop online. Amazon debuted its Mexico-based site two years ago and is now the country’s third-largest online retailer. Even so, the company’s Mexico sales of US$253 million last year were well behind the market leader, Argentina’s MercadoLibre, Inc., and only slightly above Walmex’s online revenues.
Full Content: Pymnts
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Supreme Court Declines to Hear Realtors’ Appeal, DOJ Antitrust Probe Moves Forward
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Commerzbank Chairman Doubts Amicable Merger with UniCredit After Stake Acquisition
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Senator Warren Presses HUD Nominee on Rent Price-Fixing
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Epic Games CEO Accuses Tech Giants of Shifting Loyalties to Court Trump Administration
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Apple’s New Developer Fees Face Renewed Scrutiny from EU Antitrust Regulators
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand