
The legal filing alleges that OpenAI’s shift from a nonprofit to a for-profit entity contradicts its original mission. It describes this transition as involving “flagrant breaches of its charitable mission and rampant self-dealing,” per The New York Post. Musk further contends that OpenAI, now a dominant player in artificial intelligence, is operating as a “Frankenstein” organization, strategically leveraging various corporate forms to benefit Microsoft and Altman financially.
Musk’s concerns are echoed by the legal filing, which calls for an immediate halt to OpenAI’s operations under its current structure. The complaint highlights Microsoft’s multi-billion-dollar investment in OpenAI, which Musk’s legal team suggests has transformed the company into a profit-driven enterprise. “Whatever leeway OpenAI might have been due under antitrust law as a purported charity it chose to forego when it subordinated itself to Microsoft for profit,” the filing stated.
Read more: Indian News Agency Sues OpenAI, Accuses ChatGPT of Using Content Without Permission
The injunction request was filed on behalf of Musk, his AI venture xAI, and Shivon Zilis, a former OpenAI board member and current executive at Neuralink, a brain-chip company co-founded by Musk. Zilis, who shares three children with Musk, is also a party to the lawsuit.
OpenAI responded strongly to Musk’s legal move, describing it as “utterly without merit” and accusing him of rehashing arguments from previous legal challenges. According to The New York Post, Musk has a history with OpenAI, having initially been a significant backer before parting ways following a disagreement with Altman over the company’s direction.
This legal filing follows Musk’s earlier lawsuit against OpenAI in March, which he withdrew before refiling in August.
Source: The New York Post
Featured News
CFPB Allows Some Operations to Resume Amid Legal Challenge
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
NASCAR Accuses Michael Jordan’s Race Team of Illegal Cartel in Legal Battle
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare Providers Sue BCBS Insurers Over Alleged Collusion
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Indian Distributors File Antitrust Case Against Quick-Delivery Giants
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
EU Lawmakers Send Letter Rejecting Claims of Bias in Digital Rules
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li