Incarcerated former pharma executive Martin Shkreli failed to delay an antitrust trial over his role in Vyera Pharmaceuticals’ 4,000% mark-up of an anti-parasitic drug, after a federal judge said the trial wouldn’t interfere with his participation in a drug rehabilitation program.
The Vyera founder’s motion to postpone the trial over antitrust claims brought by the Federal Trade Commission also was “untimely,” Judge Denis Cote said in her order Tuesday.
Related: “Pharma Bro” Martin Shkreli Accused Of Drug Monopoly By Insurer
New York, joined by six states and the Federal Trade Commission, sued Vyera, Shkreli, and other defendants last year alleging anticompetitive efforts to suppress generic competition to maintain a price hike from US$17.50 to US$750 per tablet of the antiparasitic drug Daraprim. The drug is used to treat the potentially fatal infection toxoplasmosis.
The proposed class action accuses them of preventing rivals from capitalizing on the “astronomical” Daraprim price hike—”from US$17.50 to US$750 per tablet”—through resale restrictions in the contracts between Vyera, Phoenixus, and the specialty manufacturers that made the drug’s key ingredients.
Vyera and the defendants had argued “equity does not permit the state plaintiffs (individually or collectively) to pursue nationwide relief on behalf of citizens of other states that are not parties to this litigation.”
Nicknamed “Pharma Bro,” Shkreli is serving a seven-year term for securities fraud. In July, the US government announced that it had sold a one-of-a-kind Wu-Tang Clan album, once owned by Shkreli, to pay off a US$7.36 million forfeiture order tied to the fraud conviction.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Independent Pharmacies Seek Court Unification in Fight Over Generic Drug Payments
Dec 2, 2024 by
CPI
EU Drops Controversial Merger Tool Following Court Ruling
Dec 2, 2024 by
CPI
Musk Sues to Stop OpenAI, Citing Antitrust Violations and Public Harm
Dec 2, 2024 by
CPI
South Korean AI Chipmakers Rebellions and Sapeon Korea Merge to Compete Globally
Dec 2, 2024 by
CPI
Australia Proposes Fines for Big Tech to Boost Fair Competition
Dec 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Moats & Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Assessing the Potential for Antitrust Moats and Trenches in the Generative AI Industry
Nov 29, 2024 by
Allison Holt, Sushrut Jain & Ashley Zhou
How SEP Hold-up Can Lead to Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
Jay Jurata, Elena Kamenir & Christie Boyden
The Role of Moats in Unlocking Economic Growth
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Overcoming Moats and Entrenchment: Disruptive Innovation in Generative AI May Be More Successful than Regulation
Nov 29, 2024 by
Simon Chisholm & Charlie Whitehead