Realtors Appeal to Supreme Court Over DOJ’s Investigation into Antitrust Violations

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) has filed a petition with the U.S. Supreme Court, requesting it to block the Justice Department from reopening an investigation into the organization’s commission practices. This move follows a previous agreement that ostensibly resolved similar inquiries into the association’s operations.
According to Reuters, the Chicago-based real estate group claims that the Justice Department’s recent actions violate the terms of a settlement reached in 2020, which had closed a prior investigation into its broker commission policies. At that time, federal authorities were examining NAR rules requiring home sellers to offer a commission to buyers’ agents, a provision seen as potentially anticompetitive.
The Justice Department withdrew from this settlement in 2021, arguing that the agreement would impede its capacity to pursue future antitrust claims against the NAR. The association’s petition contests a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, which allowed the DOJ to revisit the investigation. While the Supreme Court could choose not to hear the case, NAR’s legal team argues that the government must uphold its commitments regardless of political changes.
“Every day, federal agencies resolve civil and criminal enforcement actions through agreements with private parties,” the association’s attorneys at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan stated in the Supreme Court filing. The NAR’s spokesperson emphasized that this appeal represents a critical effort to hold the Department of Justice accountable to the terms of its previous agreement.
Related: NAR Appeals Circuit Court Decision, Takes DOJ Fight to Supreme Court
The investigation’s focus has returned to rules that required home sellers to offer commissions to buyers’ agents for their listings to appear on multiple listing services (MLS). The DOJ contends that this rule may have violated U.S. antitrust laws by directing buyers’ agents towards properties that promised higher commissions.
Earlier this year, the NAR agreed to pay $418 million to settle a nationwide class-action lawsuit from private plaintiffs over similar claims, further indicating a willingness to revise its commission practices. This settlement, which seeks final approval in a Missouri federal court, does not admit any wrongdoing on the part of the association.
In the wake of the proposed changes, NAR no longer mandates commission offers from agents for listings to appear on MLS, though commission arrangements remain negotiable.
A trial judge in Washington, D.C., previously blocked the DOJ from reopening its investigation, but the appeals court ruled in favor of the department in a 2-1 decision. The majority opinion stated that the Justice Department had made no binding commitment to refrain from launching a new investigation or reopening the closed inquiry.
The case, known as National Association of Realtors v. United States, remains unassigned within the Supreme Court as the NAR seeks clarity on the legal implications of their previous settlement and the authority of the DOJ in this matter.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Rules 5-Hour Energy Maker Gave Costco Unequal Deals, But No Antitrust Violation Found
May 29, 2025 by
CPI
EU Threatens Apple With Ongoing Fines For Non-Compliance With DMA
May 29, 2025 by
CPI
EU Expands Antitrust Probe Into Visa and Mastercard Fees, Seeks Industry Input
May 29, 2025 by
CPI
House Bill Could Strip Cities of Authority to Regulate Rent Algorithms
May 29, 2025 by
CPI
UK Regulators Approve $3.1 Billion SES-Intelsat Merger, Paving Way for Satellite Industry Shake-Up
May 29, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
CPI
Industrial Strategy and the Role of Competition – Taking a Business Lens
May 21, 2025 by
Marcus Bokkerink
Industrial Policy, Antitrust, and Economic Growth: Some Observations
May 21, 2025 by
David S. Evans
Bolder by Design: Crafting Pro-Competitive Industrial Policies For Complex Challenges
May 21, 2025 by
Antonio Capobianco & Beatriz Marques
Competition-Friendly Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
Philippe Aghion, Mathias Dewatripont & Patrick Legros