Review of Reverse-Payment Agreements: The Agencies, the Courts, Congress, and the European Commission
Elai Katz, William Rooney, Nov 01, 2009
Two bills seeking to ban reverse-payment agreements are currently pending in Congress, and the European Commission has declared that such agreements, depending on the circumstances, may violate European competition laws. Meanwhile, several U.S. Courts of Appeals have upheld reverse-payment settlements as lawful if the restrictions in the settlement are within the scope of the patent. This article provides an overview of the treatment of reverse-payment agreements by the agencies, the appellate courts, Congress, and the European Commission, without advocating a view on the legality of such agreements or the merits of court decisions, proposed legislation, or investigations relating to them.
Featured News
CRA Expands Antitrust Expertise with Senior Economist Appointment
Jul 13, 2025 by
CPI
Disney’s Proposed Antitrust Settlement Triggers Clash Among Plaintiffs’ Law Firms
Jul 13, 2025 by
CPI
Brazilian Antitrust Authority Greenlights Goodyear Chemical Unit Sale
Jul 13, 2025 by
CPI
DOJ Greenlights T-Mobile’s Purchase of US Cellular Assets Despite Market Concentration Concerns
Jul 13, 2025 by
CPI
Judge Rejects Novartis Bid to Delay Entresto Generic
Jul 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – eDiscovery & Antitrust
Jun 30, 2025 by
CPI
Off-Channel and Ephemeral Messaging in Antitrust Investigations: Legal Risks, Regulatory Focus, and Ediscovery Challenges
Jun 30, 2025 by
Daniel Rupprecht & Tristan Jenkinson
Encrypted Messaging in the Crosshairs: Compliance, Legal Risks, and Global Perspectives
Jun 30, 2025 by
Corey Bieber & Guillermo Christensen
Ephemeral and Encrypted Messaging: DOJ Expectations, Compliance Risks, and Best Practices
Jun 30, 2025 by
Megan Gerking, Joe Folio, Haydn Forrest & Adrienne Irmer
Antitrust Litigation in the Age of GenAI
Jun 30, 2025 by
Robin Perkins & Tom Gricks