Review of Reverse-Payment Agreements: The Agencies, the Courts, Congress, and the European Commission
Elai Katz, William Rooney, Nov 01, 2009
Two bills seeking to ban reverse-payment agreements are currently pending in Congress, and the European Commission has declared that such agreements, depending on the circumstances, may violate European competition laws. Meanwhile, several U.S. Courts of Appeals have upheld reverse-payment settlements as lawful if the restrictions in the settlement are within the scope of the patent. This article provides an overview of the treatment of reverse-payment agreements by the agencies, the appellate courts, Congress, and the European Commission, without advocating a view on the legality of such agreements or the merits of court decisions, proposed legislation, or investigations relating to them.
Featured News
NextEra, Dominion Strike $66.8 Billion Mega-Merger to Power AI Boom
May 19, 2026 by
CPI
US Jury Rejects Musk’s Claims Against OpenAI in High-Stakes AI Trial
May 18, 2026 by
CPI
Texas Targets Meatpacking Giants Amid Rising Beef Costs
May 18, 2026 by
CPI
Missouri Cannabis Giant Faces Second Antitrust Lawsuit as Consumer Alleges Market Manipulation
May 18, 2026 by
CPI
Coalition of 60+ Groups Urge N.J. Governor to Pause Data Center Construction
May 18, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Unilateral Effects
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
A Net Present Value Approach to Merger Analysis
Apr 28, 2026 by
Joseph J Simons & Malcolm Coate
Generative AI and Competitive Disruption: Increasingly Relevant for Merger Analysis?
Apr 28, 2026 by
Andrea Coscelli, Emily Chissell, Nitika Bagaria & Tega Akati-Udi
Non-Price Unilateral Effects In Media Mergers
Apr 28, 2026 by
Lapo Filistrucchi & Teresa Oriani
Ecosystem Mergers and Unilateral Effects? A Framework for Assessing the Ecosystem Theory of Harm
Apr 28, 2026 by
Ethel Fonseca, George Tucker & Helder Vasconcelos