Review of Reverse-Payment Agreements: The Agencies, the Courts, Congress, and the European Commission
Elai Katz, William Rooney, Nov 01, 2009
Two bills seeking to ban reverse-payment agreements are currently pending in Congress, and the European Commission has declared that such agreements, depending on the circumstances, may violate European competition laws. Meanwhile, several U.S. Courts of Appeals have upheld reverse-payment settlements as lawful if the restrictions in the settlement are within the scope of the patent. This article provides an overview of the treatment of reverse-payment agreements by the agencies, the appellate courts, Congress, and the European Commission, without advocating a view on the legality of such agreements or the merits of court decisions, proposed legislation, or investigations relating to them.
Featured News
Former Albertsons CEO Blames Kroger’s Antitrust Strategy for Collapse of $24.6B Merger
Oct 20, 2026 by
CPI
Tyson Faces Trial Over Turkey Price-Fixing Claims After Federal Court Ruling
Oct 20, 2026 by
CPI
EssilorLuxottica’s AI Glasses Success Faces a Regulatory Test
Oct 20, 2026 by
CPI
Meta Faces EU Complaint From German Publishers Over Content Access
Oct 20, 2026 by
CPI
FTC Targets Private Equity-Backed Playground Merger in Antitrust Push
Oct 20, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – EU Merger Guidelines
Oct 19, 2026 by
CPI
In Praise of Theories of Benefits
Oct 19, 2026 by
Cyril Hariton & Pierre Regibeau
Closing the Efficiencies Gap
Oct 19, 2026 by
Kasia Czapracka & Marika Harjula
Analysis of Dynamic Trade-Offs Under the New Guidelines: Would Cases Like Amazon/Irobot Turn Out Differently?
Oct 19, 2026 by
Oliver Latham, Sam Marden, Saul Mendelsohn & Serge Moresi
Exploitative Portfolio Effects In EU Merger Control: From Mars/Kellanova to the Draft Merger Guidelines
Oct 19, 2026 by
Niels Baeten, Danette Chan & Elizabeth Malik