South Korea Fines Meta $15.67 Million Over Unauthorized Data Collection and Sharing with Advertisers

Seoul, South Korea — South Korea’s data protection authority has levied a 21.62 billion won ($15.67 million) fine against Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook, for collecting and sharing sensitive user data without proper consent, according to Reuters. This decision marks a significant regulatory action as global concerns about privacy and data misuse by tech giants intensify.
According to South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC), Meta collected data on approximately 980,000 Facebook users in South Korea, including information related to users’ religious beliefs, political leanings, and sexual orientation, without obtaining explicit permission. The agency’s investigation revealed that Meta subsequently shared this data with around 4,000 advertisers, which then used it to target users with advertisements based on these sensitive personal details. The PIPC, in a statement issued Tuesday, highlighted that Meta did not take sufficient steps to obtain consent for the data gathering and sharing practices, a move that contravenes South Korean privacy laws.
Read more: Brazilian Consumer Rights Group Sues Social Media Giants Over Youth Protections
“Specifically, it has been found that Meta analyzed user behavior data, such as pages they liked and ads they clicked on, and created advertising themes that included sensitive information,” the PIPC stated, per Reuters. This information enabled the classification of users into categories that included attributes such as political views, sexual orientation, and religious beliefs, according to the data protection agency. Some of these categories reportedly included tags like “North Korean defector,” “transgender,” or affiliations with specific religious practices, the agency confirmed.
This hefty fine reflects South Korea’s increasing vigilance in upholding digital privacy rights as data privacy concerns surge worldwide.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
DoorDash, Grubhub, and Uber Eats Settle With NYC Over Cap Fees
Apr 30, 2025 by
CPI
Pork Giants Push to Overturn Price-Fixing Suit Citing Clerk’s Alleged Conflicts
Apr 30, 2025 by
CPI
Novartis to Acquire Regulus Therapeutics in $1.7 Billion Deal
Apr 30, 2025 by
CPI
India’s Competition Commission Clears J&K Bank in Antitrust Case
Apr 30, 2025 by
CPI
Spain’s Antitrust Watchdog Clears BBVA’s Sabadell Bid With Conditions
Apr 30, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece