
DoorDash, Grubhub, and Uber Eats have reached a settlement with New York City, temporarily halting a years-long legal battle over legislation that limited the fees third-party delivery platforms could charge restaurants. The agreement was formalized in a joint stipulation and order signed by U.S. District Judge Gregory H. Woods on April 29, 2025, per a statement issued as part of the court filing.
The litigation dates back to 2021, when the three delivery giants sued the city over a law introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic. The law, which placed caps on commissions charged by delivery apps, was initially presented as a temporary relief measure to help struggling local eateries. However, the cap was made permanent in 2022, prompting the companies to escalate their legal challenge. According to a statement, the platforms argued that the law amounted to unconstitutional interference in their business operations, specifically claiming it infringed on their contractual arrangements with restaurants.
Read more: DoorDash Proposes $3.6 Billion Acquisition of Deliveroo
As part of the recent settlement, all legal deadlines in the case have been paused while both sides work toward a permanent resolution. The agreement also encompasses related legal actions currently underway in New York State Supreme Court. Per a statement, the parties have agreed to explore dismissing the case entirely, depending on the outcome of ongoing discussions.
City officials have consistently defended the legislation, asserting that the caps were crucial to protecting small businesses from excessive fees that threatened their financial viability. They maintained that the regulations struck a balance between supporting local restaurants and regulating large corporate platforms.
The settlement represents a shift from prolonged litigation to potential collaboration, potentially setting a precedent for how similar disputes may be addressed in other jurisdictions. According to court records, the order issued by Judge Woods stays the federal case while negotiations proceed, leaving room for a comprehensive conclusion that could reshape the relationship between food delivery companies and municipal regulators.
Featured News
EU Regulators Probe SES-Intelsat Deal, Seek Insight on Starlink’s Competitive Threat
May 12, 2025 by
CPI
Trump Removes Copyright and Library of Congress Leaders After AI Policy Rift
May 12, 2025 by
CPI
Delta, Korean Air Buy Into WestJet in Major Cross-Border Deal
May 12, 2025 by
CPI
Trump Targets Big Pharma With Tough New Drug Pricing Rules
May 12, 2025 by
CPI
Geradin Partners Expands London Team with New Partner Hire
May 12, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece