
By: Kristian Stout (Truth On The Market)
Following Donald Trump’s victory in the US presidential election, the federal government’s approach to regulating artificial intelligence (AI) is at a pivotal moment. While there may be pressure to push through AI-related legislation during Congress’ upcoming lame-duck session, rushing such efforts could undermine U.S. leadership in AI innovation. Instead, this transition period offers a chance to take a fresh approach, carefully considering how the government can establish the right safeguards while encouraging continued development and innovation.
Despite AI’s growing influence across industries—ranging from healthcare and finance to manufacturing and transportation—federal regulatory action has been limited so far. President Joe Biden did issue an executive order on AI, and several agencies have gathered public feedback in response, but Congress has yet to pass any significant AI-specific legislation.
During a rally last year, then-candidate Trump promised: “When I’m reelected, I will cancel Biden’s artificial intelligence executive order and ban the use of AI to censor the speech of American citizens on day one.” This pledge made its way into the Republican National Committee’s platform, which declared:
“We will repeal Joe Biden’s dangerous Executive Order that stifles AI innovation and imposes radical left-wing ideas on the development of this technology. Instead, Republicans support AI development based on free speech and human flourishing.”
However, it would be naive to assume that Congress will remain inactive on AI regulation indefinitely. Given the likelihood that the federal government will take action on AI, it’s crucial that any new regulatory framework prioritizes U.S. competitiveness in AI development while ensuring appropriate safety measures. Examining current legislative proposals can highlight key priorities and potential compromises, providing insight into where Congress might ultimately steer AI regulation…
Featured News
CFPB Allows Some Operations to Resume Amid Legal Challenge
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
NASCAR Accuses Michael Jordan’s Race Team of Illegal Cartel in Legal Battle
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare Providers Sue BCBS Insurers Over Alleged Collusion
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Indian Distributors File Antitrust Case Against Quick-Delivery Giants
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
EU Lawmakers Send Letter Rejecting Claims of Bias in Digital Rules
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li