Frank Easterbrook, Apr 01, 2005
In this article, Frank Easterbrook sets out the basic components of what has become known as the error-cost framework in antitrust, an approach that has gained influence in recent years. This framework recognizes the possibility that courts will make mistakes in deciding antitrust cases, and that those mistakes will result in false positives (false convictions) and false negatives (false acquittals). Moreover, the error-cost approach focuses attention on the relative costs of false positives and false negatives.
Featured News
Canada Intensifies Scrutiny of AI Risks in Banking Sector
Jul 13, 2026 by
CPI
Second Circuit Upholds Injunction Against Nielsen in Radio Ratings Antitrust Fight
Jul 13, 2026 by
CPI
TransDigm Abandons $960M Stellant Systems Acquisition After US Antitrust Pushback
Jul 13, 2026 by
CPI
Administration Expands Effort to Keep AI-Driven Electricity Costs Off Consumer Bills
Jul 13, 2026 by
CPI
Mexican Lawmakers Move to Challenge Sony Over Potential PlayStation Store Monopoly
Jul 13, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Due Process
Jul 7, 2026 by
CPI
The Hart‑Scott‑Rodino Act at Fifty: Procedure, Thresholds, Serial Acquisitions, and Industry Dynamics
Jul 7, 2026 by
Ginger Zhe Jin, Mario Leccese, Daniel Sokol, Liad Wagman & Mengyi Zhong
Due Process In Competition Cases: Reflections As Of 2026
Jul 7, 2026 by
Ian Forrester & Pablo Trevisan
When Referees Become Reformers: Due Process and Constitutional Considerations in Competition Market Investigations
Jul 7, 2026 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Procedural Fairness in Antitrust Enforcement: A Comparative Analysis
Jul 7, 2026 by
J. Mark Gidley & Daniel Sokol