On This Topic
-
As news is unfolding, information will be constantly updated. Please check back with us for the full court opinion and an expert’s point of view!
To help inform our readers on the background and issues of interchange fees, we include the following commentary:
-
Interchange Fees: The Economics and Regulations of What Merchants Pay for Cards
This volume consists of seven articles on the economics and regulation of interchange fees. (Evans)
-
Set of DG Comp Official Documents
Download Neelie Kroes’ comments, the official European Commission decision, and an article appearing in the DG Comp newsletter. (DG Comp)
-
Interchange Fees: Are There Optimal Regulations?
Is a simple rule really better than no rule? (Verge, Calvano, Heimler, Delgado)
-
Payments Innovation, Investment, and Interchange Fees
Increasing, not reducing, innovation and investment. (Evans, Bourreau, Attinger)
-
The Monnet Project and the Future of Payments in Europe Integration
Needing different fees for different types of transactions. (Georges Pauget)
-
Regulation of the interchange fees in credit card systems
A presentation before the 2008 ESSEC Conference looking at why we should care about interchange fees. (Frederic Jenny)
-
Impact of Changes in interchange Fees on Consumers and Merchants
Do merchants pass along savings to consumers as price reductions or otherwise? (Mateus, Verdier, Maier-Rigaud)
-
Interchange Fees: Efficient Pricing or Market Failure?
Do interchange fees provide efficient pricing or market failure? (Schmalensee, Amelio, Bolt, Valletti)
-

*UPDATE* MasterCard, Visa, and several major banks have proposed a class action settlement. Merchants allege interchange fee price-fixing and anticompetitive payments practices. The $7.25 billion settlement would be the largest antitrust settlement in U.S. history.
The EU General Court has rejected MasterCard’s appeal of the European Commission’s 2007 decision to ban its cross-border multilateral interchange fees (MIF). The European Commission had found that MIF violate EC Treaty rules on restrictive business practices (Article 81), writing in the press release accompanying the decision that interchange fees “inflated the cost of card acceptance by retailers without leading to proven efficiencies.” The General Court agreed: “The methods of setting the MIF tended to overestimate the costs borne by the financial institutions on issuing payment cards and, moreover, inadequately to assess the advantages which merchants derive from that form of payment.”
Although this decision applies directly to MasterCard, the European Commission will likely set its sights on Visa Europe next.
CPI provides a full primer on the case that includes past documents and contributions from our archive, including a book on interchange fees, and a presentation on the future of payments in Europe.
Interchange fees have become increasingly controversial. These fees constitute the bulk of the cost that merchants incur for taking cards because most consumers pay with a card from a four-party system that assesses these fees. The total interchange fees paid by merchants have increased dramatically as consumers have switched to electronic payments. Merchants have complained, have filed lawsuits, and have lobbied governments to do something about this. Meanwhile governments around the world have intensified their examination of these fees.
Interchange fees have become a critical issue in the debate over the economic viability of electronic payments in the European Union as well, with rising concerns that Europe is lagging in innovation in payments. With the hoped-for success of the Single European Payments Area (SEPA) worries have been raised over the future of the European domestic schemes and the prospects for a European-based scheme to become a leading player in Europe and elsewhere in the world. Regulation of interchange fees alters the business model for payments by eliminating a source of revenue from the merchant side of the business.
Featured News
DOJ Prosecutors Advise Against Criminal Charges in Live Nation Antitrust Probe
Dec 17, 2025 by
CPI
Supreme Court Closes Door on REX Antitrust Case Against Realtors Group
Dec 17, 2025 by
CPI
PepsiCo and Walmart Face Federal Lawsuit Alleging Long-Running Price-Fixing Scheme
Dec 17, 2025 by
CPI
Utah Reaches Antitrust Settlement With Sandoz Over Generic Drug Pricing
Dec 17, 2025 by
CPI
China Regulator Flags ‘Lowest-Price’ Demands as Potential Antitrust Violations
Dec 17, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
Learning from Divergence: The Role of Cross-Country Comparisons in the Evaluation of the DMA
Dec 16, 2025 by
Federico Bruni
New Regulatory Tools for the EU Foreign Direct Investment Screening and Foreign Subsidies Regulation
Dec 16, 2025 by
Ioannis Kokkoris
“Suite Dreams”: Market Definition and Complementarity in the Digital Age
Dec 16, 2025 by
Romain Bizet & Matteo Foschi
The Interaction Between Competition Policy and Consumer Protection: Institutional Design, Behavioral Insights, and Emerging Challenges in Digital Markets
Dec 16, 2025 by
Alessandra Tonazzi


